Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39291028›Full record

ArticleACS medicinal chemistry letters2024

High-Throughput Assessment of Bile Salt Export Pump Inhibition Using RapidFire-MS and DESI-MS.

Jie Li, Nicolás M Morato, Lori S Westover, Pravien Abeywickrema, Jieping Geng, Madison Piassek, David Harden, Iulia Strambeanu, Zhicai Shi, R Graham Cooks and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in ACS medicinal chemistry letters, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Early-stage drug discovery in a new-generation ultrahigh-throughput mass spectrometry platform.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Ambient ionization mass spectrometry in brain cancer diagnosis.Journal of mass spectrometry and advances in the clinical lab · 2025
    Review
  4. Review
  5. Accelerating countermeasure candidate discovery for A-series chemical warfare agent exposure.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Jie LiGlobal Discovery Chemistry, Janssen Research and Development, Spring House, Pennsylvania 19477, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4282-4919
Nicolás M MoratoDepartment of Chemistry, Purdue University, West Lafayette, Indiana 47907, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0218-407X
Lori S WestoverDiscovery Technology and Molecular Pharmacology, Janssen Research and Development, Spring House, Pennsylvania 19477, United States.
Pravien AbeywickremaDiscovery Technology and Molecular Pharmacology, Janssen Research and Development, Spring House, Pennsylvania 19477, United States.
Jieping GengDiscovery Technology and Molecular Pharmacology, Janssen Research and Development, Spring House, Pennsylvania 19477, United States.
Madison PiassekDiscovery Technology and Molecular Pharmacology, Janssen Research and Development, Spring House, Pennsylvania 19477, United States.
David HardenDiscovery Technology and Molecular Pharmacology, Janssen Research and Development, Spring House, Pennsylvania 19477, United States.
Iulia StrambeanuGlobal Discovery Chemistry, Janssen Research and Development, Spring House, Pennsylvania 19477, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1502-5484
Zhicai ShiGlobal Discovery Chemistry, Janssen Research and Development, Spring House, Pennsylvania 19477, United States.
R Graham CooksDepartment of Chemistry, Purdue University, West Lafayette, Indiana 47907, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9581-9603
Juncai MengDiscovery Technology and Molecular Pharmacology, Janssen Research and Development, Spring House, Pennsylvania 19477, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0005-7345-207X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The bile salt export pump (BSEP) assay is widely used to evaluate the potential for drug-induced liver injury (DILI) early in the drug discovery process. While traditional liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry (LC-MS)-based approaches have been utilized for BSEP activity testing, they have intrinsic limitations in either throughput or the requirement for sample preparation and are difficult to scale up in order to screen drug candidates. Here we demonstrate the use of two different high-throughput MS methods based on solid-phase extraction (SPE) and desorption electrospray ionization (DESI) for high-throughput BSEP activity assessment in a label-free manner, with minimal needs for sample workup, at sampling rates of ∼11 and ∼5.5 s/sample, respectively. Both approaches were validated, compared, and successfully applied to the evaluation of 96 drug candidates for the inhibition of taurocholic acid (TCA) transport using BSEP vesicles.

Identifiers

PMID39291028
PMCPMC11403724

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.