ArticleDigital health
Feasibility of a noninvasive heart failure telemonitoring system: A mixed methods study.
Article in Digital health. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: The aim of this study was to examine the feasibility of a noninvasive telemonitoring system used by heart failure patients and nurses in a pilot program of the Heart Hospital unit in Tampere, Finland. Methods: This cross-sectional observational study used a mixed methods design. Quantitative data were collected with one self-generated questionnaire for patients, and qualitative data were collected with a questionnaire for patients and semi-structured focus group interviews for patients and nurses. The questionnaire was sent to 47 patients who were in the pilot program, and 29 patients (61.7%) responded. Purposefully selected 8 patients and 8 nurses attended the interviews. We used descriptive statistics to assess the quantitative data from the questionnaire and inductive thematic analysis to identify themes deriving from the focus group interviews. We categorized the themes into facilitators and barriers to telemonitoring. Results: Both the quantitative and qualitative data show that the telemonitoring system is easy to use, supports self-care and self-monitoring, and increases the feeling of safety. The chat tool of the system facilitated communication. The patients and nurses considered the system reliable despite some technical problems. The focus group interviews addressed technical challenges, nurses' increased workload, and patients' engagement with daily follow-up as possible barriers to telemonitoring. Conclusions: The noninvasive heart failure telemonitoring system used in the pilot program is feasible. We found facilitators and barriers to telemonitoring that should be considered when developing the noninvasive telemonitoring of heart failure in the future.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.