ArticleCritical pathways in cardiology2025
Emergency Department and Critical Care Use of Clevidipine for Treatment of Hypertension in Patients With Acute Stroke.
Article in Critical pathways in cardiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Clevidipine infusion for blood pressure management after successful revascularisation in acute ischaemic stroke: the CLEVER study.European stroke journal · 2026Trial
- Calcium Channel Blockers in Critical Care Medicine: Current Clinical Applications and Future Investigational Perspectives.Medical sciences (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Blood Pressure Variability After Acute Ischemic Stroke and Intracerebral Hemorrhage: Refining Its Definition, Intervention Opportunities, and Research Directions.Neurocritical care · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
background and purposeClevidipine is a parenteral dihydropyridine calcium channel blocker that received Food and Drug Administration approval in 2008 for the reduction of blood pressure (BP) when oral therapy is not feasible or not desirable. Soon after approval, our institution incorporated clevidipine into protocols for the management of hypertension among acute stroke patients, based on the drug's rapid onset of action and straightforward titration to goal. A subsequent retrospective review of its use in otherwise alteplase-eligible ischemic stroke patients with BP greater than 185/110 mm Hg (n = 32, in 2014) revealed that clevidipine in that setting demonstrated the shortest median time to BP control, the shortest median door-to-alteplase administration time, and the lowest administered volume of any parenteral antihypertensive used. As a result, clinical protocols in our institution were modified to make clevidipine first-line antihypertensive in both ischemic and hemorrhagic acute stroke. In this study, we report our institution's experience with clevidipine in acute stroke, comprising the largest such report to date.
methodsWe conducted a retrospective chart review of all acute stroke patients who received clevidipine in the emergency department (ED) or intensive care unit (ICU) (n = 295) for the management of clinically significant hypertension between January 1, 2015, and December 31, 2017. Metrics analyzed included target (goal) BP for thrombolysis eligibility among patients intended for lytic therapy according to stroke management guidelines in effect at the time of care.
resultsThe median time for initial parenteral antihypertensive dose to goal (DTG) BP for all ischemic stroke patients (both those intended for and those not intended for lytic therapy) with complete data (n = 71 of 204) was 15 minutes; median time for door-to-IV-alteplase administration for ischemic stroke patients with complete data (n = 14 of 34 treated patients) was 59 minutes. The median time for initial parenteral antihypertensive DTG BP for all hemorrhagic stroke patients with complete data (n = 33 of 91 treated patients) was 39 minutes.
conclusionsWe conclude that the salutary findings of the initial small study are valid across a larger patient sample of all acute stroke types. Based on these data, clevidipine is shown to be safe, consistent, and effective in the treatment of acute hypertension in ischemic and hemorrhagic stroke events, and is a reasonable first-line treatment option for acute hypertension in this setting.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.