SynthesisThe Journal of head trauma rehabilitation
Seizure Risk Associated With the Use of Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation for Coma Recovery in Individuals With Disordered Consciousness After Severe Traumatic Brain Injury.
Synthesis in The Journal of head trauma rehabilitation. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- State-dependent repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation in disorders of consciousness.Frontiers in human neuroscience · 2026Review
- Efficacy of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation for disorders of consciousness: a retrospective cohort study.Frontiers in neurology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
18 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveRepetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (rTMS) is emerging as a promising treatment for persons with disorder of consciousness (DoC) following traumatic brain injury (TBI). Clinically, however, there are concerns about rTMS exacerbating baseline seizure risk. To advance understanding of risks, this article reports evidence of DoC-TBI rTMS-related seizure risk.
settingAcute and sub-acute hospitals.
participantsPersons in states of DoC 6.5 months to 15 years after TBI (n = 20) who received active rTMS (n = 17) or placebo rTMS (n = 3). After completing placebo procedures, placebo participants completed active rTMS procedures. These 3 participants are included in the active group.
designMeta-analysis of data from 3 clinical trials; 2 within-subject, 1 double blind randomized placebo-controlled. Each trial used the same rTMS protocol, provided at least 30 rTMS sessions, and delivered rTMS to the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex. MAIN MEASURES: During each study's rTMS treatment phase, seizure occurrences were compared between active and placebo groups using logistic regression. After stratifying active group by presence/absence of seizure occurrences, sub-groups were compared using contingency chi-square tests of independence and relative risk (RR) ratios.
resultsTwo unique participants experienced seizures (1 active, 1 placebo). Post seizure, both participants returned to baseline neurobehavioral function. Both participants received antiepileptics during remaining rTMS sessions, which were completed without further seizures. rTMS-related seizure incidence rate is 59 per 1000 persons. Logistic regression revealed no difference in seizure occurrence by treatment condition (active vs placebo) or when examined with seizure risk factors ( P > .1). Presence of ventriculoperitoneal shunt elevated seizure risk (RR = 2.0).
conclusionCollectively, findings indicate a low-likelihood that the specified rTMS protocol exacerbates baseline seizure rates in persons with DoC after TBI. In presence of VP shunts, however, rTMS likely elevates baseline seizure risk and mitigation of this increased risk with pharmacological seizure prophylaxis should be considered.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.