ArticleBriefings in bioinformatics2024
GeneRaMeN enables integration, comparison, and meta-analysis of multiple ranked gene lists to identify consensus, unique, and correlated genes.
Article in Briefings in bioinformatics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Meta-analysis of functional genomics studies reveals conserved cellular pathways required by viruses of pandemic concern.Access microbiology · 2026Article
- MetaOmixTools: A User-Friendly Web Suite for Meta-analysis of Ranked Features and Functional Enrichment.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2026Article
- Dengue and severe dengue.Clinical microbiology reviews · 2025Review
- Functional genomics for improving adoptive T-cell transfer therapies.Journal for immunotherapy of cancer · 2025Review
- Article
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
High-throughput experiments often produce ranked gene outputs, with forward genetic screening being a notable example. While there are various tools for analyzing individual datasets, those that perform comparative and meta-analytical examination of such ranked gene lists remain scarce. Here, we introduce Gene Rank Meta Analyzer (GeneRaMeN), an R Shiny tool utilizing rank statistics to facilitate the identification of consensus, unique, and correlated genes across multiple hit lists. We focused on two key topics to showcase GeneRaMeN: virus host factors and cancer dependencies. Using GeneRaMeN 'Rank Aggregation', we integrated 24 published and new flavivirus genetic screening datasets, including dengue, Japanese encephalitis, and Zika viruses. This meta-analysis yielded a consensus list of flavivirus host factors, elucidating the significant influence of cell line selection on screening outcomes. Similar analysis on 13 SARS-CoV-2 CRISPR screening datasets highlighted the pivotal role of meta-analysis in revealing redundant biological pathways exploited by the virus to enter human cells. Such redundancy was further underscored using GeneRaMeN's 'Rank Correlation', where a strong negative correlation was observed for host factors implicated in one entry pathway versus the alternate route. Utilizing GeneRaMeN's 'Rank Uniqueness', we analyzed human coronaviruses 229E, OC43, and SARS-CoV-2 datasets, identifying host factors uniquely associated with a defined subset of the screening datasets. Similar analyses were performed on over 1000 Cancer Dependency Map (DepMap) datasets spanning 19 human cancer types to reveal unique cancer vulnerabilities for each organ/tissue. GeneRaMeN, an efficient tool to integrate and maximize the usability of genetic screening datasets, is freely accessible via https://ysolab.shinyapps.io/GeneRaMeN.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.