Evidence mapPaperPMID 39294139Full record

ReviewNPJ science of food2024

Recent advances and challenges in single cell protein (SCP) technologies for food and feed production.

Yu Pin Li, Fatemeh Ahmadi, Khalil Kariman, Maximilian Lackner

RetractedAbstract readReviewRetracted Publication
In one paragraph

Review in NPJ science of food, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It has been retracted, and should not be counted. Cited by 32 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
32citing papers in PubMed
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

32 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Hybrid origin and phenotype evolution of the modern maize.Journal of integrative plant biology · 2026
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Alternative Protein Sources in Poultry and Pig Nutrition-A Review.Journal of animal physiology and animal nutrition · 2026
    Review
  5. Article
  6. In vivo mammalian micronucleus test in mice confirms lack of genotoxic potential of a protein-rich powder derived from Xanthobacter sp. SoF1.Genes and environment : the official journal of the Japanese Environmental Mutagen Society · 2026
    Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Thermal Limits of the Estuarine AmphipodAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2025
    Article
  14. Fermentation of Common Nettle Extracts byFoods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Positive Microbiology in the Movies.Microbial biotechnology · 2025
    Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Yu Pin LiCollege of Agricultural Resources and Environmental Science, Yunnan Agricultural University, Kunming, 650201, China. liyupin2021@163.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2806-0350
Fatemeh AhmadiSchool of Agriculture and Environment, University of Western Australia, Crawley, WA, 6009, Australia.
Khalil KarimanSchool of Agriculture and Environment, University of Western Australia, Crawley, WA, 6009, Australia.
Maximilian LacknerCirce Biotechnologie GmbH, Kerpengasse 125, 1210, Vienna, Austria. m.lackner@circe.at.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The global population is increasing, with a predicted demand for 1250 million tonnes of animal-derived protein by 2050, which will be difficult to meet. Single-cell protein (SCP) offers a sustainable solution. This review covers SCP production mechanisms, microbial and substrate choices, and advancements in metabolic engineering and CRISPR-Cas. It emphasizes second-generation substrates and fermentation for a circular economy. Despite challenges like high nucleic acid content, SCP promises to solve the global nutrition problem.

Identifiers

PMID39294139
PMCPMC11410949

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.