Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39294184›Full record

ArticleNPJ vaccines2024

Evaluation of effectiveness and safety of Subolesin anti-tick vaccine in Ugandan multi-site field trial.

Fredrick Kabi, Marinela Contreras, Jimmy Semakula, Marta Sánchez-Sánchez, Clara Muñoz-Hernández, Swidiq Mugerwa, Paul Kasaija, Halid Kirunda, Gabriela de la Fuente, Rubén Fernández-Melgar and 16 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in NPJ vaccines, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Uganda's evolving national biosafety system: lessons from the past 30 years.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2025
    Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

26 authors.

Fredrick Kabi *National Livestock Resources Research Institute (NaLIRRI), National Agricultural Research Organization, Kampala, Uganda. freddykabi@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9868-1603
Marinela Contreras *SaBio, Instituto de Investigación en Recursos Cinegéticos (IREC), Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas (CSIC), Universidad de Castilla-La Mancha (UCLM)-Junta de Comunidades de Castilla-La Mancha (JCCM), Ciudad Real, Spain.
Jimmy SemakulaNational Livestock Resources Research Institute (NaLIRRI), National Agricultural Research Organization, Kampala, Uganda.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8943-1189
Marta Sánchez-SánchezSaBio, Instituto de Investigación en Recursos Cinegéticos (IREC), Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas (CSIC), Universidad de Castilla-La Mancha (UCLM)-Junta de Comunidades de Castilla-La Mancha (JCCM), Ciudad Real, Spain.
Clara Muñoz-HernándezSaBio, Instituto de Investigación en Recursos Cinegéticos (IREC), Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas (CSIC), Universidad de Castilla-La Mancha (UCLM)-Junta de Comunidades de Castilla-La Mancha (JCCM), Ciudad Real, Spain.
Swidiq MugerwaNational Livestock Resources Research Institute (NaLIRRI), National Agricultural Research Organization, Kampala, Uganda.
Paul KasaijaNational Livestock Resources Research Institute (NaLIRRI), National Agricultural Research Organization, Kampala, Uganda.
Halid KirundaMbarara Zonal Agricultural Research and Development Institute (Mbarara ZARDI), National Agricultural Research Organization, Mbarara City, Uganda.
Gabriela de la FuenteSabiotec, Edificio incubadora de empresas UCLM, Camino de Moledores s/n, Ciudad Real, Spain.
Rubén Fernández-MelgarSaBio, Instituto de Investigación en Recursos Cinegéticos (IREC), Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas (CSIC), Universidad de Castilla-La Mancha (UCLM)-Junta de Comunidades de Castilla-La Mancha (JCCM), Ciudad Real, Spain.
Marta RafaelSaBio, Instituto de Investigación en Recursos Cinegéticos (IREC), Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas (CSIC), Universidad de Castilla-La Mancha (UCLM)-Junta de Comunidades de Castilla-La Mancha (JCCM), Ciudad Real, Spain.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5923-984X
Isabel G Fernández de MeraSaBio, Instituto de Investigación en Recursos Cinegéticos (IREC), Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas (CSIC), Universidad de Castilla-La Mancha (UCLM)-Junta de Comunidades de Castilla-La Mancha (JCCM), Ciudad Real, Spain.
Moses MatovuNational Livestock Resources Research Institute (NaLIRRI), National Agricultural Research Organization, Kampala, Uganda.
Ivan KyakuwaNational Livestock Resources Research Institute (NaLIRRI), National Agricultural Research Organization, Kampala, Uganda.
Moses DhikusookaNational Livestock Resources Research Institute (NaLIRRI), National Agricultural Research Organization, Kampala, Uganda.
Godfrey NserekoNational Livestock Resources Research Institute (NaLIRRI), National Agricultural Research Organization, Kampala, Uganda.
Paul BomaNabuin ZARDI, 9HQG+5R7 Lorengdwat road, Lorengedwat, Uganda.
James BugezaNational Livestock Resources Research Institute (NaLIRRI), National Agricultural Research Organization, Kampala, Uganda.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8124-2807
Mwesigwa MosesNational Livestock Resources Research Institute (NaLIRRI), National Agricultural Research Organization, Kampala, Uganda.
Agnes NamukasaUganda government prison farm, GH2V+93H, Isimba, Uganda.
Philip ObonyoUganda government prison farm, 3FJ7+PCH, Kiburara, Uganda.
Nicholas SsekabungaMbarara Zonal Agricultural Research and Development Institute (Mbarara ZARDI), National Agricultural Research Organization, Mbarara City, Uganda.
Okeny E AdyeroUganda government prison farm, GH2V+93H, Isimba, Uganda.
Justus RutaisireNational Livestock Resources Research Institute (NaLIRRI), National Agricultural Research Organization, Kampala, Uganda.
Christian GortazarSaBio, Instituto de Investigación en Recursos Cinegéticos (IREC), Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas (CSIC), Universidad de Castilla-La Mancha (UCLM)-Junta de Comunidades de Castilla-La Mancha (JCCM), Ciudad Real, Spain.
José de la FuenteSaBio, Instituto de Investigación en Recursos Cinegéticos (IREC), Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas (CSIC), Universidad de Castilla-La Mancha (UCLM)-Junta de Comunidades de Castilla-La Mancha (JCCM), Ciudad Real, Spain. jose_delafuente@yahoo.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7383-9649

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Vaccines are the most effective and sustainable intervention to control ticks and tick-borne diseases (TBD). Using a personalized vaccine design based on regional tick genotypes, a Rhipicephalus appendiculatus Subolesin protective antigen was used in a field trial evaluating tick vaccine efficacy, effectiveness, and safety in cattle infested with multiple tick species in different Ugandan agro-ecological zones. Vaccination with SUB was safe with a protective capacity against anemia and infection, and reduced the number of infested cattle, tick fitness (feeding and reproduction) with vaccine effectiveness against multiple tick species between 93.2% at 167-196 days post-vaccination (dpv) and 61.4% at 251-327 dpv. Total integrated vaccine efficacy/effectiveness was estimated as 98.8%. The Subolesin-based vaccine is protective against multiple cattle tick infestations under field conditions in Uganda. These results support registration and commercialization of the vaccine to reduce tick populations and associated risks for human and animal TBD and chemical acaracides in Uganda.

Identifiers

PMID39294184
PMCPMC11410822

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.