ReviewScientific reports2024
A comparative evaluation of deep learning approaches for ophthalmology.
Review in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed.
- Evaluation of large language models and retrieval-augmented generation for clinical reasoning in pediatric myopia: a 50-case real-world study.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Automated Report Generation in Ophthalmology: Integrating Artificial Intelligence, Multimodal Imaging, and Clinical Data.Ophthalmology and therapy · 2026Review
- Comparative Analysis of Transformer Architectures and Ensemble Methods for Automated Glaucoma Screening in Fundus Images from Portable Ophthalmoscopes.Vision (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Evidential deep learning-based ALK-expression screening using H&E-stained histopathological images.NPJ digital medicine · 2025Article
- Uveal Pigmented Lesion Classification, Detection, and Segmentation: A Comparative Analysis of Machine Learning Tasks.Translational vision science & technology · 2025Article
- TransDualSegNet: transformer dual segment network for retinal vasculature segmentation in OCT.Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery · 2025Article
- Clinical Applications of Artificial Intelligence in Corneal Diseases.Vision (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Artificial intelligence technology in ophthalmology public health: current applications and future directions.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2025Review
- Development and Validation of a Deep Learning System for the Provision of a District-Wide Diabetes Retinal Screening Service.Clinical & experimental ophthalmologyArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
There is a growing number of publicly available ophthalmic imaging datasets and open-source code for Machine Learning algorithms. This allows ophthalmic researchers and practitioners to independently perform various deep-learning tasks. With the advancement in artificial intelligence (AI) and in the field of imaging, the choice of the most appropriate AI architecture for different tasks will vary greatly. The best-performing AI-dataset combination will depend on the specific problem that needs to be solved and the type of data available. The article discusses different machine learning models and deep learning architectures currently used for various ophthalmic imaging modalities and for different machine learning tasks. It also proposes the most appropriate models based on accuracy and other important factors such as training time, the ability to deploy the model on clinical devices/smartphones, heatmaps that enhance the self-explanatory nature of classification decisions, and the ability to train/adapt on small image datasets to determine if further data collection is worthwhile. The article extensively reviews the existing state-of-the-art AI methods focused on useful machine-learning applications for ophthalmology. It estimates their performance and viability through training and evaluating architectures with different public and private image datasets of different modalities, such as full-color retinal images, OCT images, and 3D OCT scans. The article is expected to benefit the readers by enriching their knowledge of artificial intelligence applied to ophthalmology.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.