Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39294275›Full record

ReviewScientific reports2024

A comparative evaluation of deep learning approaches for ophthalmology.

Glenn Linde, Waldir Rodrigues de Souza, Renoh Chalakkal, Helen V Danesh-Meyer, Ben O'Keeffe, Sheng Chiong Hong

Abstract readReviewComparative Study
In one paragraph

Review in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Glenn LindeoDocs Eye Care Research, Dunedin, New Zealand.
Waldir Rodrigues de SouzaDepartment of Ophthalmology, Dunedin Hospital, Te Whatu Ora Southern, Dunedin, New Zealand.
Renoh ChalakkaloDocs Eye Care Research, Dunedin, New Zealand. renohcj@odocs-tech.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3452-5633
Helen V Danesh-MeyerDepartment of Ophthalmology, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand.
Ben O'KeeffeoDocs Eye Care Research, Dunedin, New Zealand.
Sheng Chiong HongoDocs Eye Care Research, Dunedin, New Zealand.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

There is a growing number of publicly available ophthalmic imaging datasets and open-source code for Machine Learning algorithms. This allows ophthalmic researchers and practitioners to independently perform various deep-learning tasks. With the advancement in artificial intelligence (AI) and in the field of imaging, the choice of the most appropriate AI architecture for different tasks will vary greatly. The best-performing AI-dataset combination will depend on the specific problem that needs to be solved and the type of data available. The article discusses different machine learning models and deep learning architectures currently used for various ophthalmic imaging modalities and for different machine learning tasks. It also proposes the most appropriate models based on accuracy and other important factors such as training time, the ability to deploy the model on clinical devices/smartphones, heatmaps that enhance the self-explanatory nature of classification decisions, and the ability to train/adapt on small image datasets to determine if further data collection is worthwhile. The article extensively reviews the existing state-of-the-art AI methods focused on useful machine-learning applications for ophthalmology. It estimates their performance and viability through training and evaluating architectures with different public and private image datasets of different modalities, such as full-color retinal images, OCT images, and 3D OCT scans. The article is expected to benefit the readers by enriching their knowledge of artificial intelligence applied to ophthalmology.

Indexed as

Deep LearningImage Processing, Computer-AssistedOphthalmologyHumansArtificial intelligenceDeep learningDiabetic retinopathyFundus imagingOphthalmoscopy

Identifiers

PMID39294275
PMCPMC11410932

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.