SynthesisCalcified tissue international2024
Dental Abnormalities in Osteogenesis Imperfecta: A Systematic Review.
Synthesis in Calcified tissue international, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed.
- Dose matters: haploinsufficiency in osteogenesis imperfecta.Nature reviews. Endocrinology · 2026Review
- Evaluating dental developmental abnormalities in osteogenesis imperfecta: associations with timing and cumulative exposure to intravenous pamidronate- a pilot study.Clinical oral investigations · 2026Article
- Multidisciplinary Oral Rehabilitation in Osteogenesis Imperfecta: 18-Year-Old Case Report.Clinical case reports · 2026Article
- Phenotypic Variability and Diagnostic Characteristics of Pediatric Osteogenesis Imperfecta: A 10-Year Multicenter Cohort Study from Three Tertiary Pediatric Hospitals in Bucharest, Romania.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Rare disease care pathways profile in France: leveraging hospital big data to characterize natural history in osteogenesis imperfecta.JBMR plus · 2026Article
- Osteogenesis imperfecta: a registry-based study of the clinical symptoms of disease in a large cohort of Italian patients.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2026Article
- Finite element analysis of temporomandibular joint stress distribution during treatment with novel digital composite plates and invisible aligners.BMC oral health · 2025Article
- Oral Manifestations in Adolescents with Genetic Syndromes: A Retrospective Cross-Sectional Study.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
- Investigation of oral health findings and genotype correlations in osteogenesis imperfecta.Odontology · 2025Article
- The Therapeutic Approaches Dealing with Malocclusion Type III-Narrative Review.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Article
- Extra-Skeletal Manifestations in Osteogenesis Imperfecta Mouse Models.Calcified tissue international · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Osteogenesis imperfecta (OI) is a rare genetic disorder characterized by fragile bones and skeletal deformities. Individuals with OI may have dental abnormalities such as dentinogenesis imperfecta (DI) type I, malocclusions, and unerupted or missing teeth. This review comprehensively examines these dental abnormalities to assess their prevalence among the OI population and explore potential differences across different clinical types of OI and pathogenic variants. In accordance with the PRISMA guidelines, a systematic literature search in PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science was conducted that included articles up to June 2024. Out of 672 articles screened, 34 were included. The included studies confirmed that dental abnormalities are prevalent in OI, with DI prevalence ranging from approximately 20 to 48%. Those with a more severe skeletal phenotype (OI type III/IV) exhibited more dental abnormalities than those with a milder skeletal phenotype (OI type I). Notably, OI type V individuals generally do not have DI, although a few isolated cases have been reported. The prevalence of occlusion types varied: Class I occlusion ranged from 14.8 to 50% and Class II malocclusion ranged from 0 to 37.5%, while Class III malocclusion from 4.1 to 84%. This differs from the general population, where Class III malocclusion is typically the least common. Open bites, cross-bites, and unerupted and missing teeth are also commonly reported, particularly in OI types III and IV. This review emphasizes the need for comprehensive dental examinations in OI due to the high prevalence of dental abnormalities. Additionally, the review draws attention to the lack of clear guidelines for diagnosing DI.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.