Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39294766›Full record

ArticleEnvironmental evidence2024

Navigating the science policy interface: a co-created mind-map to support early career research contributions to policy-relevant evidence.

Carla-Leanne Washbourne, Ranjini Murali, Nada Saidi, Sophie Peter, Paola Fontanella Pisa, Thuan Sarzynski, Hyeonju Ryu, Anna Filyushkina, Carole Sylvie Campagne, Andrew N Kadykalo and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Environmental evidence, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Carla-Leanne Washbourne *Department of Science, Technology, Engineering and Public Policy, University College London, Gower Street, London, WC1E 6BT, UK. c.washbourne@ucl.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7818-918X
Ranjini Murali *Geography Department, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Unter den Linden 6, 10099, Berlin, Germany.
Nada Saidi *UNESCO Centre for Water Law, Policy & Science, University of Dundee, Nethergate, Dundee, DD1 4HN, UK.
Sophie PeterISOE-Institute for Social-Ecological Research, Hamburger Allee 45, 60486, Frankfurt am Main, Germany.
Paola Fontanella PisaGlobal Mountain Safeguard Research (GLOMOS), Institute for Environment and Human Security, United Nations University, Bolzano, Italy.
Thuan SarzynskiCIRAD (Centre de Coopération Internationale en Recherche Agronomique Pour le Développement), UMR DIADE, 34398, Montpellier, France.
Hyeonju RyuBNZ Partners, 10, Gukhoe-daero 76-gil, Yeongdeungpo-gu, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Anna FilyushkinaInstitute for Environmental Studies (IVM), Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, De Boelelaan 1111, 1081 HV, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Carole Sylvie CampagneSorbonne Université, CNRS, Station Biologique de Roscoff, UMR7144, Adaptation et Diversité en Milieu Marin, Sorbonne Université, Place Georges Teissier, 29680, Roscoff, France.
Andrew N KadykaloDepartment of Biology and Institute of Environmental and Interdisciplinary Sciences, Carleton University, 15 1125 Colonel By Drive, Ottawa, ON, K1S 5B6, Canada.
Giovanni Ávila-FloresDepartamento Académico de Ciencias Marinas y Costeras, Universidad Autónoma de Baja California Sur, La Paz, Baja California Sur, México.
Taha AmiarUniversity Felix Houphouet-Boigny, WABES Project, BP V34, 01, Abidjan, Côte d'Ivoire.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The interface between science and policy is a complex space, in theory and practice, that sees the interaction of various actors and perspectives coming together to enable policy-relevant evidence to support decision-making. Early Career Researchers (ECRs) are increasingly interested in working at the science-policy interface to support evidence-informed policy, with the number of opportunities to do so increasing at national and international levels. However, there are still many challenges limiting ECRs participation, not least how such a complex space can be accessed and navigated. While recommendations for engaging at the science-policy interface already exist, a practical 'map' of the science-policy interface landscape which would allow for ECR participation in evidence co-production and synthesis in science-policy is missing. With the purpose of facilitating the engagement of ECRs producing biodiversity and ecosystem services policy-relevant evidence at the interface between science and policy, the authors have co-created a 'mind-map'-a tool to review the landscape of and leverage access to the science-policy interface. This tool was developed through reviewing published literature, collating personal experiences of the ECR authors, and validating against wider peer perspectives in an ECR workshop during the 7th Plenary of the Intergovernmental Science-Policy Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services (IPBES). This co-created tool sees ECR engagement in (co-)producing evidence at the science-policy interface as an interaction of three main factors: the environment of the ECR, which mediates their acts of engagement at the science-policy interface leading to outcomes that will ultimately have a reciprocal impact on the ECR's environment.

Indexed as

BiodiversityBoundary organizationsCapacity buildingEcosystem servicesEvidenceImplementation scienceScience-policy interface

Identifiers

PMID39294766
PMCPMC11378860

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.