Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39295105›Full record

Trial reportBrain and behavior2024

Benefits of inspiratory muscle training therapy in institutionalized adult people with cerebral palsy: A double-blind randomized controlled trial.

Carlos Martin-Sanchez, Fausto Jose Barbero-Iglesias, Victor Amor-Esteban, Marta Martin-Sanchez, Ana Maria Martin-Nogueras

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Brain and behavior, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Carlos Martin-SanchezNursing and Physiotherapy Department, University of Salamanca, Salamanca, Spain.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8627-3645
Fausto Jose Barbero-IglesiasNursing and Physiotherapy Department, University of Salamanca, Salamanca, Spain.
Victor Amor-EstebanStatistics Department, University of Salamanca, Salamanca, Spain.
Marta Martin-SanchezNursing Department, Salamanca University Clinical Hospital, Salamanca, Spain.
Ana Maria Martin-NoguerasNursing and Physiotherapy Department, University of Salamanca, Salamanca, Spain.

Funding

Colegio Profesional de Fisioterapeutas de Castilla y León
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundRespiratory health problems are one of the main causes of morbidity and mortality in adult people with cerebral palsy (CP). The influence of respiratory muscle training has not yet been studied in this population group. The objective of the study was to evaluate and compare the efficacy of two protocols with inspiratory muscle training (IMT), low intensity and high intensity, to improve respiratory strength and pulmonary function in adults with CP.

methodsThe study was a controlled, randomized, double-blind trial with allocation concealment. Twenty-seven institutionalized CP patients were recruited and randomly distributed in the high-intensity training group (HIT) or low-intensity training group (LIT). Over 8 weeks, an IMT protocol was followed 5 days/week, 10 series of 1 min with 1 min rest between them. HIT trained with a load of 40% of the maximum inspiratory pressure (MIP) and LIT with 20%. Respiratory strength and pulmonary function were evaluated.

resultsAfter IMT intervention, MIP, maximum expiratory pressure, forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV

conclusionInspiratory muscle training improved respiratory muscle strength and pulmonary function in adults with CP. Training with a 40% MIP load improved all the evaluated parameters and was the most effective treatment for adults with CP.

Indexed as

Breathing ExercisesCerebral PalsyMuscle StrengthRespiratory MusclesAdultDouble-Blind MethodFemaleHumansInhalationMaleMiddle AgedRespiratory Function TestsTreatment Outcomeagingcerebral palsymuscle strengtholder adultsphysical therapy

Identifiers

PMID39295105
PMCPMC11410885

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.