ArticleHeliyon2024
Molecular basis of CX-5461-induced DNA damage response in primary vascular smooth muscle cells.
Article in Heliyon, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- CX-5461 and doxorubicin activate a shared DNA damage-associated transcriptional response in human cardiomyocytes.G3 (Bethesda, Md.) · 2026Article
- Natural G-Quadruplex Stabilizers: A Targeted Strategy for Breast Cancer Therapy.Drug design, development and therapy · 2026Review
- Targeting RNA polymerase I to boost natural killer cell anticancer activity in multiple myeloma.Cell death & disease · 2025Article
- Establishment of an imaging-based screening pipeline for the identification of human ribosome biogenesis inhibitors.BMC biology · 2025Article
- Nucleolar stress facilitates islet β cell senescence via hijacking the DNA damage response pathways.iScience · 2025Article
- The G-quadruplex ligand CX-5461: an innovative candidate for disease treatment.Journal of translational medicine · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Our previous studies have shown that the novel selective RNA polymerase I inhibitor CX-5461 suppresses proliferation of vascular smooth muscle cells, mainly by inducing DNA damage response (DDR), including activations of ataxia telangiectasia mutated (ATM)/ATM and Rad3-related (ATR) and p53. Currently, there is no information about the molecular mechanism(s) underlying CX-5461-induced DDR in vascular cells, while the results obtained in cancer cells and immortalized cell lines are controversial. In this study, we examined the responses of various DDR pathways to CX-5461 treatment in primary aortic smooth muscle cells isolated from normal adult Sprague Dawley rats. We demonstrated that CX-5461-induced DDR was not associated with activations of the nucleotide excision repair, DNA mismatch repair, or the non-homologous end joining pathways, while the homologous recombination pathway was activated. However, the alkaline comet assay did not show massive DNA double strand breaks in CX-5461-treated cells. Instead, CX-5461-induced DDR appeared to be related to induction of DNA replication stress, which was not attributable to increased formation of G-quadruplex or R-loop structures, but might be explained by the increased replication-transcription conflict. CX-5461-induced DDR was not exclusively confined to rDNA within the nucleolar compartment; the extra-nucleolar DDR might represent a distinct secondary response related to the downregulated Rad51 expression in CX-5461-treated cells. In summary, we suggest that DNA replication stress may be the primary molecular event leading to downstream ATM/ATR and p53 activations in CX-5461-treated vascular smooth muscle cells. Our results provide further insights into the molecular basis of the beneficial effects of CX-5461 in proliferative vascular diseases.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.