ArticleHeliyon2024
CD133
Article in Heliyon, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Extracellular Matrix Stiffness Regulates Cancer Stemness in Uveal Melanoma via the PIEZO1-DOT1L Axis.Investigative ophthalmology & visual science · 2025Article
- Nanomaterials targeting cancer stem cells to overcome drug resistance and tumor recurrence.Frontiers in oncology · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: This study explores the correlation between Forkhead box M1 (FOXM1) and ATP-binding cassette subfamily C member 5 (ABCC5) in relation to paclitaxel resistance in cervical cancer. It aims to identify potential cervical cancer stem cell markers, offering fresh perspectives for developing therapeutic strategies to overcome paclitaxel chemoresistance in cervical cancer. Methods: Paclitaxel-resistant Hela cells (Hela/Taxol) were developed by intermittently exposing Hela cells to progressively increasing concentrations of paclitaxel. We assessed the biological properties of both Hela and Hela/Taxol cells using various assays: cell proliferation, clonogenic, cell cycle, apoptosis, scratch, and transwell. To determine which markers better represent tumor stem cells, we analyzed various known and potential stem cell markers in combination. Flow cytometry was employed to measure the proportion of positive markers in both parental and drug-resistant cell lines. Following statistical analysis to establish relative stability, CD133+ABCC5+ cells were sorted for further examination. Subsequent tests included sphere-forming assays and Western blot analysis to detect the presence of the stem cell-specific protein Sox2, aiding in the identification of viable cervical cancer stem cell markers. Results: The Hela/Taxol cell line exhibited significantly enhanced proliferation, migration, and invasion capabilities compared to the Hela cell line, alongside a marked reduction in apoptosis rates (P < 0.01). Notably, proportions of CD44 Conclusion: The Hela/Taxol cells demonstrate increased tumoral stemness, suggesting that CD133+ABCC5+ may serve as a novel marker for cervical cancer stem cells.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.