Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39296836›Full record

SynthesisFrontiers in public health2024

Age- and gender-based social inequalities in palliative care for cancer patients: a systematic literature review.

Marina Rodríguez-Gómez, Guadalupe Pastor-Moreno, Isabel Ruiz-Pérez, Vicenta Escribà-Agüir, Vivian Benítez-Hidalgo

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Frontiers in public health, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Marina Rodríguez-GómezHospital Clínico Universitario de Valencia, Valencia, Spain.
Guadalupe Pastor-MorenoAndalusian School of Public Health (EASP), Granada, Spain.
Isabel Ruiz-PérezAndalusian School of Public Health (EASP), Granada, Spain.
Vicenta Escribà-AgüirFundación para el Fomento de la Investigación Sanitaria y Biomédica de la Comunidad Valenciana (FISABIO), Valencia, Spain.
Vivian Benítez-HidalgoAndalusian School of Public Health (EASP), Granada, Spain.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objectives: Cancer is a major public health problem worldwide, given its magnitude and growing burden, in addition to the repercussions on health and quality of life. Palliative care can play an important role improving quality of life and it is cost-effective, but some population groups may not benefit from it or benefit less based on age and gender inequalities. The aim of this systematic review was to analyze the available evidence on age- and gender-based social inequalities in access to and use of palliative care in cancer patients. Methods: A systematic review was conducted following the PRISMA guidelines. An exhaustive literature research was performed in Pubmed, CINHAL and Embase until November 2022 and were not restricted by language or date of publication. Eligible studies were observational studies analyzing the access and use of palliative care in cancer patients. Results: Fifty-three studies were included in the review. Forty-five analyzed age and 44 analyzed gender inequalities in relation to use of and access to palliative care. Our results show that older people receive poorer quality of care, worst symptom control and less preferences for palliative care. In relation to gender, women have a greater preference for the use of palliative care and generally have more access to basic and specialized palliative care services and palliative care facilities. Conclusion: This review reveals difficulties for older persons and men for access to key elements of palliative care and highlights the need to tackle access barriers for the most vulnerable population groups. Innovative collaborative services based around patient, family and wider community are needed to ensure optimal care.

Indexed as

Healthcare DisparitiesNeoplasmsPalliative CareSocioeconomic FactorsAgedAge FactorsFemaleHealth Services AccessibilityHumansMaleQuality of LifeSex Factorsagegenderhospice and palliative carepalliative carereview – systematic

Identifiers

PMID39296836
PMCPMC11408182

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.