Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39297316›Full record

ArticleAdvanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany)2025

3D Printed Mesh Geometry Modulates Immune Response and Interface Biology in Mouse and Sheep Model: Implications for Pelvic Floor Surgery.

Kallyanashis Paul, Saeedeh Darzi, Cathal D O'Connell, David M Z B Hennes, Anna Rosamilia, Caroline E Gargett, Jerome A Werkmeister, Shayanti Mukherjee

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Chapter 4.5: New Proposed Treatments for Pelvic Organ Prolapse.International urogynecology journal · 2026
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Kallyanashis PaulThe Ritchie Centre, Hudson Institute of Medical Research, Clayton, 3168, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0953-3263
Saeedeh DarziThe Ritchie Centre, Hudson Institute of Medical Research, Clayton, 3168, Australia.
Cathal D O'ConnellBiofab3D@ACMD, St Vincent's Hospital, Melbourne, VIC, 3065, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1690-9505
David M Z B HennesThe Ritchie Centre, Hudson Institute of Medical Research, Clayton, 3168, Australia.
Anna RosamiliaThe Ritchie Centre, Hudson Institute of Medical Research, Clayton, 3168, Australia.
Caroline E GargettThe Ritchie Centre, Hudson Institute of Medical Research, Clayton, 3168, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3590-2077
Jerome A WerkmeisterThe Ritchie Centre, Hudson Institute of Medical Research, Clayton, 3168, Australia.
Shayanti MukherjeeThe Ritchie Centre, Hudson Institute of Medical Research, Clayton, 3168, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9995-002X

Funding

Hudson Institute of Medical ResearchJohnson and Johnson WiSTEM2D scholar's programMedical Research Future FundMonash UniversityNational Health and Medical Research Council 1159677National Health and Medical Research Council 1173882National Health and Medical Research Council 1184841Rebecca L Cooper FoundationScience and Industry Endowment Fund PF16-122Victorian Government's Operational Infrastructure Support Program
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Pelvic organ prolapse (POP) is a highly prevalent yet neglected health burden for women. Strengthening the pelvic floor with bioactive tissue-engineered meshes is an emerging concept. This study investigates tissue regenerative design parameters, including degradability, porosity, and angulation, to develop alternative degradable melt electrowritten (MEW) constructs for surgical applications of POP. MEW constructs were fabricated in hierarchical geometries by two-way stacking of the fibers with three different inter layer angles of 90°, 45°, or 22.5°. Implants printed at 22.5° have higher tensile strength under dry conditions and show better vaginal fibroblast (VF) attachment in vitro. In vivo assessment using preclinical mouse and ovine models demonstrates more effective degradation and improved tissue integration in 22.5° angular meshes compared to 90° and 45° meshes, with evidence of neo-collagen deposition within implants at 6 weeks. The pattern and geometry of the layered MEW implants also influence the foreign body response, wherein the anti-inflammatory phenotype shows a greater ratio of anti-inflammatory CD206+ M2 macrophages/pro-inflammatory CCR7+ M1 macrophages. This presents an attractive strategy for improving the design and fabrication of next-generation vaginal implants for pelvic reconstructive surgery.

Indexed as

Pelvic FloorPelvic Organ ProlapsePrinting, Three-DimensionalSurgical MeshAnimalsDisease Models, AnimalFemaleMiceSheepTissue EngineeringVagina3D‐printinggynaecologyimplant immune responsemelt electrowritingtissue engineering

Identifiers

PMID39297316
PMCPMC11923936

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.