Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39297879›Full record

ArticleBriefings in bioinformatics2024

VISTA: an integrated framework for structural variant discovery.

Varuni Sarwal, Seungmo Lee, Jianzhi Yang, Sriram Sankararaman, Mark Chaisson, Eleazar Eskin, Serghei Mangul

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Briefings in bioinformatics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Structural Variation and Its Roles in Plant Genomes.Plants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Varuni SarwalDepartment of Computer Science, University of California Los Angeles, 580 Portola Plaza, Los Angeles, CA 90095, United States.
Seungmo LeeDepartment of Computer Science, University of California Los Angeles, 580 Portola Plaza, Los Angeles, CA 90095, United States.
Jianzhi YangDepartment of Quantitative and Computational Biology, Dana and David Dornsife College of Letters, Arts and Sciences University of Southern California, 3540 S Figueroa St, Los Angeles, California 90089, United States.
Sriram SankararamanDepartment of Computer Science, University of California Los Angeles, 580 Portola Plaza, Los Angeles, CA 90095, United States.
Mark ChaissonDepartment of Quantitative and Computational Biology, Dana and David Dornsife College of Letters, Arts and Sciences University of Southern California, 3540 S Figueroa St, Los Angeles, California 90089, United States.
Eleazar EskinDepartment of Computer Science, University of California Los Angeles, 580 Portola Plaza, Los Angeles, CA 90095, United States.
Serghei MangulDepartment of Quantitative and Computational Biology, Dana and David Dornsife College of Letters, Arts and Sciences University of Southern California, 3540 S Figueroa St, Los Angeles, California 90089, United States.ORCID 0000-0003-4770-3443

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Structural variation (SV) refers to insertions, deletions, inversions, and duplications in human genomes. SVs are present in approximately 1.5% of the human genome. Still, this small subset of genetic variation has been implicated in the pathogenesis of psoriasis, Crohn's disease and other autoimmune disorders, autism spectrum and other neurodevelopmental disorders, and schizophrenia. Since identifying structural variants is an important problem in genetics, several specialized computational techniques have been developed to detect structural variants directly from sequencing data. With advances in whole-genome sequencing (WGS) technologies, a plethora of SV detection methods have been developed. However, dissecting SVs from WGS data remains a challenge, with the majority of SV detection methods prone to a high false-positive rate, and no existing method able to precisely detect a full range of SVs present in a sample. Previous studies have shown that none of the existing SV callers can maintain high accuracy across various SV lengths and genomic coverages. Here, we report an integrated structural variant calling framework, Variant Identification and Structural Variant Analysis (VISTA), that leverages the results of individual callers using a novel and robust filtering and merging algorithm. In contrast to existing consensus-based tools which ignore the length and coverage, VISTA overcomes this limitation by executing various combinations of top-performing callers based on variant length and genomic coverage to generate SV events with high accuracy. We evaluated the performance of VISTA on comprehensive gold-standard datasets across varying organisms and coverage. We benchmarked VISTA using the Genome-in-a-Bottle gold standard SV set, haplotype-resolved de novo assemblies from the Human Pangenome Reference Consortium, along with an in-house polymerase chain reaction (PCR)-validated mouse gold standard set. VISTA maintained the highest F1 score among top consensus-based tools measured using a comprehensive gold standard across both mouse and human genomes. VISTA also has an optimized mode, where the calls can be optimized for precision or recall. VISTA-optimized can attain 100% precision and the highest sensitivity among other variant callers. In conclusion, VISTA represents a significant advancement in structural variant calling, offering a robust and accurate framework that outperforms existing consensus-based tools and sets a new standard for SV detection in genomic research.

Indexed as

Genome, HumanGenomic Structural VariationSoftwareAlgorithmsComputational BiologyGenetic VariationGenomicsHumansWhole Genome Sequencingbioinformaticscomputational biologymachine learningstructural variation

Identifiers

PMID39297879
PMCPMC11411772

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.