Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39297953›Full record

ReviewNeuroradiology2024

Pediatric head and neck emergencies.

Sumit Singh, Timothy N Booth, Rebekah L Clarke

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Neuroradiology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Guideline
  2. Imaging for Pediatric Head and Neck Emergencies: Critical Insights.Journal of the Korean Society of Radiology · 2026
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Sumit SinghDepartment of Radiology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3753-5861
Timothy N BoothDepartment of Radiology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, USA.
Rebekah L ClarkeDepartment of Radiology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, USA. Rebekah.clarke@utsouthwestern.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1859-2502

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeHead and neck emergencies in children are frequent cause of visits to the hospital. Imaging plays a critical role in the management of these patients. This review article aims to familiarize radiologists with the common clinical presentations encountered, imaging characteristics of nontraumatic pediatric head and neck emergencies, and improve their ability to recognize associated complications as well as be aware of common mimics.

methodsWe researched our database for commonly encountered nontraumatic head and neck emergencies in children. A literature search was done to compare and complete the list of conditions to be discussed in this review.

resultsThe review was organized according to anatomical location of the emergent condition. Relevant anatomy has been discussed along with clinical presentation, imaging characteristics and complications. We have presented common mimics with each set of disorders. Key imaging characteristics have been delineated using radiology images.

conclusionFamiliarity with the known complications of head and neck emergencies allows the radiologist to actively search for such findings, encourage early institution of appropriate therapy, and improve outcomes.

Indexed as

EmergenciesChildChild, PreschoolDiagnosis, DifferentialHeadHumansInfantNeckGradenigo syndromeIdiopathic orbital inflammationLuc abscessMastoiditisOrbital cellulitisPeritonsillar abscessRetropharyngeal abscessSuppurative retropharyngeal adenitisTonsillar abscess

Identifiers

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.