ArticleOncology and therapy2024
Real-World Study of the Burden of Myelodysplastic Syndromes in Patients and Their Caregivers in Europe and the United States.
Article in Oncology and therapy, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Health-system burden of higher-risk myelodysplastic syndromes in England: a literature-based micro-cost analysis.BMJ open · 2026Article
- Understanding the evolving role of early palliative care in myelodysplastic syndromes: a 2026 narrative review.Annals of hematology · 2026Review
- Unmet Needs and Their Impact on Quality of Life and Symptoms in Myelodysplastic Neoplasm Patients and Caregivers.Cancers · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionMyelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) are characterized by bone marrow failure, peripheral blood cytopenias and a high risk of progression to acute myeloid leukemia (AML), which is associated with a poor prognosis and low survival rates. This study combined surveys with patient chart reviews to document real-world clinical practice and burden of MDS, including perspectives of physicians, patients and caregivers and underlying discrepancies.
methodsPhysicians in major European countries and the US provided information on 1445 patients, stratified into lower- (LR) and higher-risk (HR) MDS. Patients had the opportunity to complete questionnaires describing the impact of MDS. Caregivers had the option to report on the burden of caring for a patient with MDS.
resultsWhile supportive treatment was common, mainly with erythropoietins (52%), anti-AML agents were more frequently used in HR than in LR patients (70% vs 20%), while HR patients generally received more transfusions (48% vs 36%). Symptoms with the largest discordance between patient vs physician reporting were excessive bruising (30% vs 14%), GI side effects (19% vs 6%) and feeling tired or fatigued (68% vs 56%). A bigger impact of fatigue was reported on the European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30) for HR vs LR patients (43.2 vs 36.5 on a scale from 0 to 100). There was discordance between caregivers vs physicians on reporting of weekly caregiver hours (45.4 vs 29.2) with a Zarit Burden Interview score (ZBI, score 0-88) of 25.4.
conclusionsPatients reported a higher frequency than their physicians of top symptoms, with MDS-related disruptions in daily life for both patients and caregivers. There is a need for new therapeutic strategies, along with shared understanding and decision making among patients, caregivers and physicians, to optimize disease management and improve quality of life in people living with MDS.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.