Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39299270›Full record

SynthesisThrombosis and haemostasis2025

Risk of Recurrent Venous Thromboembolism in Patients with Cancer: An Individual Patient Data Meta-analysis and Development of a Prediction Model.

Vincent R Lanting, Toshihiko Takada, Floris T M Bosch, Andrea Marshall, Michael A Grosso, Annie M Young, Agnes Y Y Lee, Marcello Di Nisio, Gary E Raskob, Pieter W Kamphuisen and 2 more

Abstract readMeta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Thrombosis and haemostasis, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Vincent R LantingAmsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Department of Vascular Medicine, Amsterdam Cardiovascular Sciences, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0001-8269-9473
Toshihiko TakadaJulius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Floris T M BoschAmsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Department of Vascular Medicine, Amsterdam Cardiovascular Sciences, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Andrea MarshallWarwick Clinical Trials Unit, University of Warwick, Coventry, United Kingdom.
Michael A GrossoClinical Development, Daiichi Sankyo, Basking Ridge, New Jersey, United States.
Annie M YoungWarwick Clinical Trials Unit, University of Warwick, Coventry, United Kingdom.
Agnes Y Y LeeDivision of Hematology, University of British Columbia, British Columbia Cancer Agency, Vancouver BC, Canada.
Marcello Di NisioDepartment of Medicine and Ageing Sciences, Gabriele D'Annunzio University, Chieti, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-5930-7304
Gary E RaskobUniversity of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center and OU Health, Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, United States.
Pieter W KamphuisenAmsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Department of Vascular Medicine, Amsterdam Cardiovascular Sciences, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Harry R BüllerAmsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Department of Vascular Medicine, Amsterdam Cardiovascular Sciences, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Nick van EsAmsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Department of Vascular Medicine, Amsterdam Cardiovascular Sciences, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

About 7% of patients with cancer-associated venous thromboembolism (CAT) develop a recurrence during anticoagulant treatment. Identification of high-risk patients may help guide treatment decisions.To identify clinical predictors and develop a prediction model for on-treatment recurrent CAT.For this individual patient data meta-analysis, we used data from four randomized controlled trials evaluating low-molecular-weight heparin or direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) for CAT (Hokusai VTE Cancer, SELECT-D, CLOT, and CATCH). The primary outcome was adjudicated on-treatment recurrent CAT during a 6-month follow-up. A clinical prediction model was developed using multivariable logistic regression analysis with backward selection. This model was validated using internal-external cross-validation. Performance was assessed by the c-statistic and a calibration plot.After excluding patients using vitamin K antagonists, the combined dataset comprised 2,245 patients with cancer and acute CAT who were treated with edoxaban (23%), rivaroxaban (9%), dalteparin (47%), or tinzaparin (20%). Recurrent on-treatment CAT during the 6-month follow-up occurred in 150 (6.7%) patients. Predictors included in the final model were age (restricted cubic spline), breast cancer (odds ratio [OR]: 0.42; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.20-0.87), metastatic disease (OR: 1.44; 95% CI: 1.01-2.05), treatment with DOAC (OR: 0.66; 95% CI: 0.44-0.98), and deep vein thrombosis only as an index event (OR: 1.72; 95% CI: 1.31-2.27). The c-statistic of the model was 0.63 (95% CI: 0.54-0.72) after internal-external cross-validation. Calibration varied across studies.The prediction model for recurrent CAT included five clinical predictors and has only modest discrimination. Prediction of recurrent CAT at the initiation of anticoagulation remains challenging.

Indexed as

AnticoagulantsDecision Support TechniquesNeoplasmsVenous ThromboembolismAgedFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPyridinesRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicRecurrenceRisk AssessmentRisk FactorsRivaroxabanThiazolesAnticoagulantsedoxabanPyridinesRivaroxabanThiazoles

Identifiers

PMID39299270
PMCPMC12115544

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.