ArticleScientific reports2024
Label-free ghost cytometry for manufacturing of cell therapy products.
Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- From production to bedside: A tiered QC framework for regulatory alignment and analytical comparability in decentralized CGT.Regenerative therapy · 2026Review
- Dynamic, single-cell monitoring of CAR T cell identity and activation with Raman spectroscopy.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- Plying potency assays for immunotherapy of solid tumors.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Review
- Characterizing Recent PDMS Changes in Electrokinetic-Based Microfluidic Devices' Performance and Manufacturing for Cell Sorting Applications.Electrophoresis · 2025Article
- Beyond the Limits: How Is Spectral Flow Cytometry Reshaping the Clinical Landscape and What Is Coming Next?Cells · 2025Review
- Smart CAR-T Nanosymbionts: archetypes and proto-models.Frontiers in immunology · 2025Review
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Automation and quality control (QC) are critical in manufacturing safe and effective cell and gene therapy products. However, current QC methods, reliant on molecular staining, pose difficulty in in-line testing and can increase manufacturing costs. Here we demonstrate the potential of using label-free ghost cytometry (LF-GC), a machine learning-driven, multidimensional, high-content, and high-throughput flow cytometry approach, in various stages of the cell therapy manufacturing processes. LF-GC accurately quantified cell count and viability of human peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) and identified non-apoptotic live cells and early apoptotic/dead cells in PBMCs (ROC-AUC: area under receiver operating characteristic curve = 0.975), T cells and non-T cells in white blood cells (ROC-AUC = 0.969), activated T cells and quiescent T cells in PBMCs (ROC-AUC = 0.990), and particulate impurities in PBMCs (ROC-AUC ≧ 0.998). The results support that LF-GC is a non-destructive label-free cell analytical method that can be used to monitor cell numbers, assess viability, identify specific cell subsets or phenotypic states, and remove impurities during cell therapy manufacturing. Thus, LF-GC holds the potential to enable full automation in the manufacturing of cell therapy products with reduced cost and increased efficiency.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.