ReviewZhongguo xiu fu chong jian wai ke za zhi = Zhongguo xiufu chongjian waike zazhi = Chinese journal of reparative and reconstructive surgery2024
[Research progress of silk-based biomaterials for peripheral nerve regeneration].
Review in Zhongguo xiu fu chong jian wai ke za zhi = Zhongguo xiufu chongjian waike zazhi = Chinese journal of reparative and reconstructive surgery, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Artificial intelligence and peripheral neuropathies: Strategies for the development, application, and repair of regenerative biomaterials.Neural regeneration research · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: To describe the research progress of silk-based biomaterials in peripheral nerve repair and provide useful ideals to accelerate the regeneration of large-size peripheral nerve injury. Methods: The relative documents about silk-based biomaterials used in peripheral nerve regeneration were reviewed and the different strategies that could accelerate peripheral nerve regeneration through building bioactive microenvironment with silk fibroin were discussed. Results: Many silk fibroin tissue engineered nerve conduits have been developed to provide multiple biomimetic microstructures, and different microstructures have different mechanisms of promoting nerve repair. Biomimetic porous structures favor the nutrient exchange at wound sites and inhibit the invasion of scar tissue. The aligned structures can induce the directional growth of nerve tissue, while the multiple channels promote the axon elongation. When the fillers are introduced to the conduits, better growth, migration, and differentiation of nerve cells can be achieved. Besides biomimetic structures, different nerve growth factors and bioactive drugs can be loaded on silk carriers and released slowly at nerve wounds, providing suitable biochemical cues. Both the biomimetic structures and the loaded bioactive ingredients optimize the niches of peripheral nerves, resulting in quicker and better nerve repair. With silk biomaterials as a platform, fusing multiple ways to achieve the multidimensional regulation of nerve microenvironments is becoming a critical strategy in repairing large-size peripheral nerve injury. Conclusion: Silk-based biomaterials are useful platforms to achieve the design of biomimetic hierarchical microstructures and the co-loading of various bioactive ingredients. Silk fibroin nerve conduits provide suitable microenvironment to accelerate functional recovery of peripheral nerves. Different optimizing strategies are available for silk fibroin biomaterials to favor the nerve regeneration, which would satisfy the needs of various nerve tissue repair. Bioactive silk conduits have promising future in large-size peripheral nerve regeneration.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.