Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39301173›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology2024

Finite element analysis and

Amir Abbas Seraji, Reza Nahavandi, Amir Kia, Ahad Rabbani Doost, Vahid Keshavarz, Fariborz Sharifianjazi, Ketevan Tavamaishvili, Dorna Makarem

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Amir Abbas SerajiDepartment of Mechanical and Industrial Engineering, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Reza NahavandiDepartment of Biochemical and Pharmaceutical Engineering, School of Chemical Engineering, College of Engineering, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran.
Amir KiaDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, University of Guilan, Rasht, Iran.
Ahad Rabbani DoostDepartment of Biomaterials, Iran Polymer and Petrochemical Institute, Tehran, Iran.
Vahid KeshavarzDepartment of Materials Engineering, Faculty of Engineering and Technology, Imam Khomeini International University, Qazvin, Iran.
Fariborz SharifianjaziCenter for Advanced Materials and Structures, School of Science and Technology, The University of Georgia, Tbilisi, Georgia.
Ketevan TavamaishviliSchool of Medicine, Georgian American University, Tbilisi, Georgia.
Dorna MakaremEscuela Tecnica Superior de Ingenieros de Telecomunicacion Politecnica de Madrid, Madrid, Spain.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Bone structures facilitate the regeneration and repair of bone tissue in regions where it has been damaged or destroyed, either temporarily or permanently. Therefore, the bone's fatigue strength and durability are crucial to its efficacy and longevity. Several variables, such as the construct's material qualities, design, and production procedure, loading and unloading cycles, and physiological conditions influence the endurance life of bone constructs. Metals, ceramics, and polymers are all routinely utilized to create bone substitutes, and each of these materials has unique features that might affect the fatigue strength and endurance life of the final product. The mechanical performance and capacity to promote bone tissue regeneration may be affected by the scaffold's design, porosity, and pore size. Researchers employ mechanical testing under cyclic loading circumstances as one example of an experimental approach used to assess bone construction endurance. These analyses can give us important information about the stress-strain behavior, resistance to multiple loading cycles, and fatigue strength of the new structure. Predicting the endurance life of the developed construct may also be possible with the use of simulations and numerical analyses. Hence, in order to create reliable and efficient constructs for bone tissue engineering, it is crucial to understand their fatigue strength and durability. The purpose of this study is to analyze the effective parameters for fatigue strength of bone structures and to gather the models and evaluations utilized in endurance life assessments.

Indexed as

bone constructsbone tissue engineeringcyclic loadingdurabilityendurance lifefatigue strength

Identifiers

PMID39301173
PMCPMC11410606

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.