ReviewFrontiers in psychiatry2024
A multidimensional framework for understanding problematic use of short video platforms: the role of individual, social-environmental, and platform factors.
Review in Frontiers in psychiatry, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed.
- How balanced time perspective affects short-video addiction: a chain mediation model based on trait anxiety and ego depletion.BMC psychology · 2026Article
- Longitudinal relationship from school burnout to short video addiction in adolescents: the mediating role of psychological distress.BMC psychology · 2026Article
- Patterns of Short Video Use and Mental Health Among Adolescents: A Latent Profile Analysis.The Psychiatric quarterly · 2026Article
- Association of problematic short-video use with adolescent depression: a cross-sectional study and machine learning identification model construction.BMC psychiatry · 2026Article
- Exercise-based interventions for problematic short-video use: a narrative review of current evidence and potential psychological pathways.Frontiers in psychology · 2026Review
- The dual-path association between upward social comparison and short video addiction: parallel mediating roles of negative emotions and psychological resilience.Frontiers in psychology · 2026Article
- Linking subjective well-being to short-video addiction among college students: the serial mediating roles of alienation and self-control.Frontiers in psychiatry · 2026Article
- Beyond the cognitive haze: BrainRot, cognitive flexibility, physical exercise, and anxiety symptoms among Chinese adolescents.Frontiers in psychiatry · 2026Article
- A dual-moderation model of physical activity and gender in the relationship between experiential avoidance and short video dependency.Frontiers in psychology · 2026Article
- When stress meets the feed: algorithmic curation, digital stress relief, and academic amotivation in the attention economy.Frontiers in psychology · 2026Article
- Problematic short drama addiction among Chinese Gen X women: a ZMET approach.Frontiers in psychology · 2026Article
- From attachment anxiety to short video addiction: the roles of attentional control and alexithymia.Frontiers in psychology · 2026Article
- An 8-week 24-form Tai Chi intervention on cognition in Chinese college students overusing short videos: a randomized controlled trial.Frontiers in psychology · 2025Article
- Why can parents' phubbing affect mobile phone addiction? Perspective of the I-PACE model.Frontiers in psychiatry · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Short video platforms have rapidly become a prominent form of social media, but their problematic use is increasingly concerning. This review synthesizes existing research to propose a comprehensive framework that integrates individual, social-environmental, and platform-related factors contributing to this issue. Individual factors are categorized into distal (e.g., personality, psychopathology) and proximal (e.g., usage expectations, cognitive, emotional, and behavioral responses during use) categories, with distal factors often shaping proximal ones, which more directly influence usage behaviors. Social-environmental factors, such as family dynamics and peer interactions, along with platform-related features, also significantly impact the likelihood of problematic use. Beyond their direct effects, our framework emphasizes the importance of examining the combined effects of these factors, particularly through mediation and moderation processes. Mediation processes reveal how distal individual factors influence problematic use by shaping more immediate, proximal factors. Similarly, social-environmental influences and platform features may affect problematic use by modifying individual factors. Moderation processes further illustrate how individual characteristics or social-environmental factors may alter the strength of these relationships. Understanding these complex, multidimensional relationships is essential for developing effective interventions to mitigate the risks associated with problematic short video platforms use. Future research should explore these processes in greater depth.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.