Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39301488›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in medicine2024

Machine learning models for predicting risks of MACEs for myocardial infarction patients with different VEGFR2 genotypes.

Alexander Kirdeev, Konstantin Burkin, Anton Vorobev, Elena Zbirovskaya, Galina Lifshits, Konstantin Nikolaev, Elena Zelenskaya, Maxim Donnikov, Lyudmila Kovalenko, Irina Urvantseva and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Alexander Kirdeev *Faculty of Computer Science, AI and Digital Science Institute, International Laboratory of Bioinformatics, Higher School of Economics University, Moscow, Russia.
Konstantin Burkin *Faculty of Computer Science, AI and Digital Science Institute, International Laboratory of Bioinformatics, Higher School of Economics University, Moscow, Russia.
Anton Vorobev *Department of Cardiology, Surgut State University, Surgut, Russia.
Elena ZbirovskayaFaculty of Computer Science, AI and Digital Science Institute, International Laboratory of Bioinformatics, Higher School of Economics University, Moscow, Russia.
Galina LifshitsInstitute of Chemical Biology and Fundamental Medicine, Novosibirsk, Russia.
Konstantin NikolaevFederal Research Center Institute of Cytology and Genetics, Novosibirsk, Russia.
Elena ZelenskayaDepartment of Cardiology, Surgut State University, Surgut, Russia.
Maxim DonnikovDepartment of Cardiology, Surgut State University, Surgut, Russia.
Lyudmila KovalenkoDepartment of General Pathology and Pathophysiology, Surgut State University, Surgut, Russia.
Irina UrvantsevaDepartment of Cardiology, Surgut State University, Surgut, Russia.
Maria PoptsovaFaculty of Computer Science, AI and Digital Science Institute, International Laboratory of Bioinformatics, Higher School of Economics University, Moscow, Russia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: The development of prognostic models for the identification of high-risk myocardial infarction (MI) patients is a crucial step toward personalized medicine. Genetic factors are known to be associated with an increased risk of cardiovascular diseases; however, little is known about whether they can be used to predict major adverse cardiac events (MACEs) for MI patients. This study aimed to build a machine learning (ML) model to predict MACEs in MI patients based on clinical, imaging, laboratory, and genetic features and to assess the influence of genetics on the prognostic power of the model. Methods: We analyzed the data from 218 MI patients admitted to the emergency department at the Surgut District Center for Diagnostics and Cardiovascular Surgery, Russia. Upon admission, standard clinical measurements and imaging data were collected for each patient. Additionally, patients were genotyped for VEGFR-2 variation rs2305948 (C/C, C/T, T/T genotypes with T being the minor risk allele). The study included a 9-year follow-up period during which major ischemic events were recorded. We trained and evaluated various ML models, including Gradient Boosting, Random Forest, Logistic Regression, and AutoML. For feature importance analysis, we applied the sequential feature selection (SFS) and Shapley's scheme of additive explanation (SHAP) methods. Results: The CatBoost algorithm, with features selected using the SFS method, showed the best performance on the test cohort, achieving a ROC AUC of 0.813. Feature importance analysis identified the dose of statins as the most important factor, with the VEGFR-2 genotype among the top 5. The other important features are coronary artery lesions (coronary artery stenoses ≥70%), left ventricular (LV) parameters such as lateral LV wall and LV mass, diabetes, type of revascularization (CABG or PCI), and age. We also showed that contributions are additive and that high risk can be determined by cumulative negative effects from different prognostic factors. Conclusion: Our ML-based approach demonstrated that the VEGFR-2 genotype is associated with an increased risk of MACEs in MI patients. However, the risk can be significantly reduced by high-dose statins and positive factors such as the absence of coronary artery lesions, absence of diabetes, and younger age.

Indexed as

left ventricular wallMACEsmachine learningmyocardial infarctionprognostic modelingstatinsvascular endothelial growth factor receptor 2 gene

Identifiers

PMID39301488
PMCPMC11410707

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.