ArticleSexual medicine2024
No bidirectional association between serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D and erectile dysfunction: Mendelian randomization and genetic association studies.
Article in Sexual medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Letter to the editor on "No bidirectional association between serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D and erectile dysfunction: Mendelian randomization and genetic association studies".Sexual medicine · 2025Article
- The associations among platelet count, mean platelet volume, and erectile dysfunction: an observational and Mendelian randomization study.Sexual medicine · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The causal relationship between the level of serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D [25(OH)D] and the risk of erectile dysfunction (ED) is still unclear. Aim: We tried to determine the causal relationship between the level of serum 25(OH)D and ED risk. Methods: In this study, we used genome-wide association study data from the UK Biobank to analyse the relationship between serum 25(OH)D (as the exposure) and ED (as the outcome). Linkage disequilibrium score regression (LDSC) was used to assess the genetic correlation between 2 traits. The CAUSE (Causal Analysis using Summary Effect estimates) method and Mendelian randomization (MR) were employed to evaluate the bidirectional causal relationship. The MRlap method was utilized to assess the impact of sample overlap on the results. To assess potential heterogeneity and horizontal pleiotropy, we utilized methods such as MR-Egger, MR-PRESSO (Mendelian Randomization Pleiotropy Residual Sum and Outlier), weighted median, and others. Outcomes: The primary outcome was defined as self or physician-reported ED, or using oral ED medication, or a history of surgery related to ED. Results: The LDSC analysis did not reveal a significant genetic correlation between serum 25(OH)D and ED (r Clinical implications: This study provides evidence on whether vitamin D needs to be ingested to prevent or treat ED. Strengths and limitations: We used LDSC and MR to avoid bias. However, the population in this study was limited to European ancestry. Conclusion: No causal relationship was found between 25(OH)D and ED.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.