ReviewPlanta2024
Cytoplasmic male sterility-based hybrids: mechanistic insights.
Review in Planta, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Causes and consequences of cytonuclear incompatibility in hybrids of flowering plants.Journal of experimental botany · 2026Review
- From High-Density Genomic Mapping to Precision Molecular Breeding: A Comprehensive Review ofGenes · 2026Review
- Identification of metabolic pathways associated with cytoplasmic male sterility in cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.) using Data-Independent Acquisition-based proteomic profiling.BMC plant biology · 2026Article
- Genetic Resources of Cereal and Oilseed Crops for Heterotic Hybrid Breeding.Plants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Characterization and Transcriptome Analysis Reveal Abnormal Pollen Germination in Cytoplasmic Male Sterile Tomato.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Article
- Analysis ofInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
MAIN
conclusionA comprehensive understanding of the nucleocytoplasmic interactions that occur between genes related to the restoration of fertility and cytoplasmic male sterility (CMS) provides insight into the development of hybrids of important crop species. Modern biotechnological techniques allow this to be achieved in an efficient and quick manner. Heterosis is paramount for increasing the yield and quality of a crop. The development of hybrids for achieving heterosis has been well-studied and proven to be robust and efficient. Cytoplasmic male sterility (CMS) has been explored extensively in the production of hybrids. The underlying mechanisms of CMS include the role of cytotoxic proteins, PCD of tapetal cells, and improper RNA editing of restoration factors. On the other hand, the restoration of fertility is caused by the presence of restorer-of-fertility (Rf) genes or restorer genes, which inhibit the effects of sterility-causing genes. The interaction between mitochondria and the nuclear genome is crucial for several regulatory pathways, as observed in the CMS-Rf system and occurs at the genomic, transcriptional, post-transcriptional, translational, and post-translational levels. These CMS-Rf mechanisms have been validated in several crop systems. This review aims to summarize the nucleo-mitochondrial interaction mechanism of the CMS-Rf system. It also sheds light on biotechnological interventions, such as genetic engineering and genome editing, to achieve CMS-based hybrids.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39302508What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.