ReviewCurrent cardiology reports2024
Computational Medicine: What Electrophysiologists Should Know to Stay Ahead of the Curve.
Review in Current cardiology reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purpose of reviewTechnology drives the field of cardiac electrophysiology. Recent computational advances will bring exciting changes. To stay ahead of the curve, we recommend electrophysiologists develop a robust appreciation for novel computational techniques, including deterministic, statistical, and hybrid models. RECENT
findingsIn clinical applications, deterministic models use biophysically detailed simulations to offer patient-specific insights. Statistical techniques like machine learning and artificial intelligence recognize patterns in data. Emerging clinical tools are exploring avenues to combine all the above methodologies. We review three ways that computational medicine will aid electrophysiologists by: (1) improving personalized risk assessments, (2) weighing treatment options, and (3) guiding ablation procedures. Leveraging clinical data that are often readily available, computational models will offer valuable insights to improve arrhythmia patient care. As emerging tools promote personalized medicine, physicians must continue to critically evaluate technology-driven tools they consider using to ensure their appropriate implementation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.