Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39302964›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2024

Humans flexibly integrate social information despite interindividual differences in reward.

Alexandra Witt, Wataru Toyokawa, Kevin N Lala, Wolfgang Gaissmaier, Charley M Wu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Semantic knowledge guides innovation and drives cultural evolution.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026
    Article
  4. Review
  5. Social information creates self-fulfilling prophecies in judgments of pain, vicarious pain, and cognitive effort.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026
    Article
  6. Review
  7. How social learning enhances-or undermines-efficiency and flexibility in collective decision-making under uncertainty.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Social inequity disrupts reward-based learning.Communications psychology · 2025
    Article
  11. Article
  12. A Rational Framework for Group-Based Selective Social Learning.Open mind : discoveries in cognitive science · 2025
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Group Coordination Catalyzes Individual and Cultural Intelligence.Open mind : discoveries in cognitive science · 2024
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Alexandra WittHuman and Machine Cognition Lab, University of Tübingen, Tübingen 72074, Germany.ORCID 0009-0000-3537-5249
Wataru ToyokawaSocial Psychology and Decision Sciences, Department of Psychology, University of Konstanz, Konstanz 78464, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-8558-8568
Kevin N LalaSchool of Biology, University of St Andrews, St Andrews KY16 9AJ, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-2457-0900
Wolfgang GaissmaierSocial Psychology and Decision Sciences, Department of Psychology, University of Konstanz, Konstanz 78464, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-6273-178X
Charley M WuHuman and Machine Cognition Lab, University of Tübingen, Tübingen 72074, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-2215-572X

Funding

Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG) 390727645Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG) 42203798
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

There has been much progress in understanding human social learning, including recent studies integrating social information into the reinforcement learning framework. Yet previous studies often assume identical payoffs between observer and demonstrator, overlooking the diversity of social information in real-world interactions. We address this gap by introducing a socially correlated bandit task that accommodates payoff differences among participants, allowing for the study of social learning under more realistic conditions. Our Social Generalization (SG) model, tested through evolutionary simulations and two online experiments, outperforms existing models by incorporating social information into the generalization process, but treating it as noisier than individual observations. Our findings suggest that human social learning is more flexible than previously believed, with the SG model indicating a potential resource-rational trade-off where social learning partially replaces individual exploration. This research highlights the flexibility of humans' social learning, allowing us to integrate social information from others with different preferences, skills, or goals.

Indexed as

RewardSocial LearningAdultFemaleHumansIndividualityMaleSocial BehaviorYoung Adultcomputational modelingevolutionary simulationsexplorationgeneralizationsocial learning

Identifiers

PMID39302964
PMCPMC11441569

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.