ReviewAgeing research reviews2024
Neuroimaging and biofluid biomarkers across race and ethnicity in older adults across the spectrum of cognition.
Review in Ageing research reviews, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Diagnostic performance of plasma p-Tau217, p-Tau181, and p-Tau231 across the Alzheimer's disease continuum: a network meta-analysis.Frontiers in aging neuroscience · 2026Pooled it
- Ancestry-specific effects ofmedRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2026Article
- Cognitive screening biases in a secondary prevention Alzheimer's disease clinical trial.Alzheimer's & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's Association · 2026Article
- Sociodemographic correlates of cognition and Alzheimer's disease and vascular biomarkers among middle to older age participants in the Healthy Brain Initiative.Journal of Alzheimer's disease : JAD · 2025Article
- Associations of Longitudinal Changes in Blood Biomarkers of Dementia With the Proportion of Genetically Inferred African Ancestry.Neurology · 2025Article
- Comprehensive evaluation of plasma tau biomarkers for detecting and monitoring Alzheimer's disease in a multicenter and multiethnic aging population.Nature aging · 2025Article
- Deciphering the epigenetic role of long non-coding RNAs in mood disorders: Focus on human brain studies.Clinical and translational medicine · 2025Review
- Health and Aging Brain Study-Health Disparities (HABS-HD) methods and partner characteristics.Alzheimer's & dementia (New York, N. Y.)Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
18 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Neuroimaging and biofluid biomarkers provide a proxy of pathological changes for Alzheimer's disease (AD) and are useful in improving diagnosis and assessing disease progression. However, it is not clear how race/ethnicity and different prevalence of AD risks impact biomarker levels. In this narrative review, we survey studies focusing on comparing biomarker differences between non-Hispanic White American(s) (NHW), African American(s) (AA), Hispanic/Latino American(s) (HLA), and Asian American(s) with normal cognition, mild cognitive impairment, and dementia. We found no strong evidence of racial and ethnic differences in imaging biomarkers after controlling for cognitive status and cardiovascular risks. For biofluid biomarkers, in AA, higher levels of plasma Aβ42/Aβ40, and lower levels of CSF total tau and p-tau 181, were observed after controlling for APOE status and comorbidities compared to NHW. Examining the impact of AD risks and comorbidities on biomarkers and their contributions to racial/ethnic differences in cognitive impairment are critical to interpreting biomarkers, understanding their generalizability, and eliminating racial/ethnic health disparities.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.