ArticleEpigenetics2024
Implementation of the Methyl-Seq platform to identify tissue- and sex-specific DNA methylation differences in the rat epigenome.
Article in Epigenetics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Genome-Wide Annotation of Promoter-Enhancer Interactions via Chromatin Loops in the Hybrid Rat Diversity Panel.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- Molecular responses of chicken embryos to maternal heat stress through DNA methylation and gene expression: a pilot study.Environmental epigenetics · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Epigenomic annotations for the rat lag far behind those of human and mouse, despite the rat's immense utility in pharmacological and behavioral studies and the need to understand their epigenetic mechanisms. We have designed a targeted-enrichment method followed by next-generation sequencing (Methyl-Seq) to identify DNA methylation (DNAm) signatures across the rat genome. The design reflected an attempt to create a more comprehensive investigation of the rat epigenome, as it included promoters, CpG islands, and island shores of all RefSeq genes. In this study, we implemented the rat Methyl-Seq platform and tested its ability to distinguish differentially methylated regions (DMRs) among three different tissue types, three distinct brain regions, and, in the hippocampus, between males and females. These comparisons yielded DNAm differences of differing magnitudes, many of which were independently validated by bisulfite pyrosequencing, including autosomal regions that were predicted to show the least degree of difference in DNAm between males and females. Quantitative reverse transcription PCR revealed that most genes associated with the DMRs showed tissue-, brain region-, and sex-specific differences in expression. In particular, we found evidence for sex-specific DNAm and expression differences at
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.