Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39308594›Full record

ReviewAmerican journal of clinical and experimental urology2024

Artificial intelligence in pathologic diagnosis, prognosis and prediction of prostate cancer.

Min Zhu, Rasoul Sali, Firas Baba, Hamdi Khasawneh, Michelle Ryndin, Raymond J Leveillee, Mark D Hurwitz, Kin Lui, Christopher Dixon, David Y Zhang

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in American journal of clinical and experimental urology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Min ZhuDepartment of Computational Pathology, NovinoAI 1443 NE 4th Ave, Fort Lauderdale, FL 33304, USA.
Rasoul SaliDepartment of Computational Pathology, NovinoAI 1443 NE 4th Ave, Fort Lauderdale, FL 33304, USA.
Firas BabaDepartment of Computational Pathology, NovinoAI 1443 NE 4th Ave, Fort Lauderdale, FL 33304, USA.
Hamdi KhasawnehKing Hussein School of Computing Sciences, Princess Sumaya University for Technology Amman 11855, Jordan.
Michelle RyndinCollege of Agriculture and Life Sciences, Cornell University 616 Thurston Ave, Ithaca, NY 14853, USA.
Raymond J LeveilleeDepartment of Surgery, Florida Atlantic University, Division of Urology, Bethesda Hospital East, Baptist Health South Florida 2800 S. Seacrest Drive, Boynton Beach, FL 33435, USA.
Mark D HurwitzDepartment of Radiation Medicine, New York Medical College and Westchester Medical Center Valhalla, NY 10595, USA.
Kin LuiDepartment of Urology, Mount Sinai Hospital New York, NY 10029, USA.
Christopher DixonDepartment of Urology, Good Samaritan Hospital, Westchester Medical Center Health Network Suffern, NY 10901, USA.
David Y ZhangDepartment of Computational Pathology, NovinoAI 1443 NE 4th Ave, Fort Lauderdale, FL 33304, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Histopathology, which is the gold-standard for prostate cancer diagnosis, faces significant challenges. With prostate cancer ranking among the most common cancers in the United States and worldwide, pathologists experience an increased number for prostate biopsies. At the same time, precise pathological assessment and classification are necessary for risk stratification and treatment decisions in prostate cancer care, adding to the challenge to pathologists. Recent advancement in digital pathology makes artificial intelligence and learning tools adopted in histopathology feasible. In this review, we introduce the concept of AI and its various techniques in the field of histopathology. We summarize the clinical applications of AI pathology for prostate cancer, including pathological diagnosis, grading, prognosis evaluation, and treatment options. We also discuss how AI applications can be integrated into the routine pathology workflow. With these rapid advancements, it is evident that AI applications in prostate cancer go beyond the initial goal of being tools for diagnosis and grading. Instead, pathologists can provide additional information to improve long-term patient outcomes by assessing detailed histopathologic features at pixel level using digital pathology and AI. Our review not only provides a comprehensive summary of the existing research but also offers insights for future advancements.

Indexed as

Artificial intelligencediagnosisgradingmachine learningpathologypredictionprognosisprostate cancertreatment

Identifiers

PMID39308594
PMCPMC11411179

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.