Trial reportJournal of experimental pharmacology2024
Open-Label Interventional Study in Healthy Volunteers to Evaluate NO-Mediated Vasodilation by Dermal Allyl Isothiocyanate Challenge and Whole-Body Heat Stress.
Trial report in Journal of experimental pharmacology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Health Benefits, Applications, and Analytical Methods of Freshly Produced Allyl Isothiocyanate.Foods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Dermal allyl isothiocyanate (AITC) administration and whole-body heat stress (WBHS) are two challenge models that are used to evaluate physiological mechanisms of vasodilation and pharmacological activity in humans. Their exact vasodilatory mechanisms in humans are not fully elucidated but are likely to be nitric oxide (NO)-mediated. This study aimed to evaluate whether there is overlap in the vasodilatory pathways of dermal AITC application and WBHS by combining the challenges. In this open-label interventional study, healthy volunteers underwent dermal administration of AITC twice: under basal conditions and during WBHS. Dermal blood flow (DBF) was non-invasively measured using laser speckle contrast imaging four times, once in each of the following situations: baseline, WBHS only, AITC only, and WBHS combined with AITC. A total of 12 male volunteers, aged 18-61 years, participated in the study. Compared to baseline, following AITC application, their DBF increased by 63.43 AU (baseline: 32.55, 95% CI [17.78, 47.31] AU, AITC only: 95.97, 95% CI [81.21, 110.7] AU, p < 0.0001). During WBHS, the increase in DBF after AITC was 42.76 AU (WBHS only: 87.25, 95% CI [72.49, 102.0] AU, WBHS+AITC: 130.0, 95% CI [115.2, 144.8] AU, p < 0.0001). The combination of WBHS and AITC resulted in a lower DBF than the sum of the DBF responses to AITC and WBHS when applied separately (ED 20.67, 95% CI [-3.532, 44.88], p = 0.0916). This might point towards the presence of an interaction in the vasodilatory mechanism of AITC application and WBHS, possibly indicating overlap in their NOS-driven vasodilatory pathways.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.