ArticleAmerican journal of cardiovascular disease2024
Impact of risk factors on intervened and non-intervened coronary lesions.
Article in American journal of cardiovascular disease, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Assessment of Risk Factors for Coronary Artery Restenosis and Patient Survival During the COVID-19 Pandemic.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionIn-stent restenosis (ISR) and aggravated non-intervened coronary lesions (ANL) are two pivotal aspects of disease progression in patients with coronary artery disease (CAD). Established risk factors for both include hyperlipidemia, hypertension, diabetes, chronic kidney disease, and smoking. However, there is limited research on the comparative risk factors for the progression of these two aspects of progression. The aim of this study was to analyze and compare the different impacts of identical risk factors on ISR and ANL.
methodsThis study enrolled a total of 510 patients with multiple coronary artery lesions who underwent repeated coronary angiography (CAG). All patients had previously undergone percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) and presented non-intervened coronary lesions in addition to the previously intervened vessels.
resultsAfter data analysis, it was determined that HbA1c (OR 1.229, 95% CI 1.022-1.477, P=0.028) and UA (OR 1.003, 95% CI 1.000-1.005, P=0.024) were identified as independent risk factors for ISR. Furthermore, HbA1c (OR 1.215, 95% CI 1.010-1.460, P=0.039), Scr (OR 1.007, 95% CI 1.003-1.017, P=0.009), and ApoB (OR 1.017, 95% CI 1.006-1.029, P=0.004) were identified as independent risk factors for ANL. The distribution of multiple blood lipid levels differed between the ANL only group and the ISR only group. Non-HDL-C (2.17 mmol/L vs. 2.44 mmol/L, P=0.007) and ApoB (63.5 mg/dL vs. 71.0 mg/dL, P=0.011) exhibited significantly higher values in the ANL only group compared to the ISR only group.
conclusionsBlood glucose levels and chronic kidney disease were identified as independent risk factors for both ISR and ANL, while elevated lipid levels were only significantly associated with ANL. In patients with non-intervened coronary lesions following PCI, it is crucial to assess the concentration of non-HDL-C and ApoB as they serve as significant risk factors.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.