Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39309369›Full record

ArticleGastro hep advances2024

Use of Machine Learning to Predict Onset of NAFLD in an All-Comers Cohort-Development and Validation in 2 Large Asian Cohorts.

Daniel Yan Zheng Lim, Goh Eun Chung, Pei Hua Cher, Ramasamy Chockalingam, Won Kim, Chee Kiat Tan

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Gastro hep advances, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Daniel Yan Zheng LimHealth Service Research Unit, Medical Board, Singapore General Hospital, Singapore, Singapore.
Goh Eun ChungDepartment of Internal Medicine and Healthcare Research Institute, Seoul National University Hospital Healthcare System Gangnam Center, Seoul, Korea.
Pei Hua CherDuke-NUS Medical School, Singapore, Singapore.
Ramasamy ChockalingamDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Singapore General Hospital, Singapore, Singapore.
Won KimDivision of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Internal Medicine, Seoul Metropolitan Government Seoul National University Boramae Medical Center, Seoul, Korea.
Chee Kiat TanDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Singapore General Hospital, Singapore, Singapore.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background and Aims: Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) is one of the most common liver diseases. There are no universally accepted models that accurately predict time to onset of NAFLD. Machine learning (ML) models may allow prediction of such time-to-event (ie, survival) outcomes. This study aims to develop and independently validate ML-derived models to allow personalized prediction of time to onset of NAFLD in individuals who have no NAFLD at baseline. Methods: The development dataset comprised 25,599 individuals from a South Korean NAFLD registry. A random 70:30 split divided it into training and internal validation sets. ML survival models (random survival forest, extra survival trees) were fitted, with time to NAFLD diagnosis in months as the target variable and routine anthropometric and laboratory parameters as predictors. The independent validation dataset comprised 16,173 individuals from a Chinese open dataset. Models were evaluated using the concordance index (c-index) and Brier score on both the internal and independent validation sets. Results: The datasets (development vs independent validation) had 1,331,107 vs 543,874 person months of follow-up, NAFLD incidence of 25.7% (6584 individuals) vs 14.4% (2322 individuals), and median time to NAFLD onset of 60 (interquartile range 38-75) vs 24 (interquartile range 13-37) months, respectively. The ML models achieved a good c-index of >0.7 in the validation cohort-random survival forest 0.751 (95% confidence interval 0.742-0.759), extra survival trees 0.752 (95% confidence interval 0.744-0.762). Conclusion: ML models can predict time-to-onset of NAFLD based on routine patient data. They can be used by clinicians to deliver personalized predictions to patients, which may facilitate patient counseling and clinical decision making on interval imaging timing.

Indexed as

Artificial IntelligenceMachine LearningNAFLDRandom Survival ForestSurvival ModelingTime to Event

Identifiers

PMID39309369
PMCPMC11415843

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.