Observational studyJBRA assisted reproduction2024
Anti-Müllerian hormone as a predictor of the number of oocytes obtained during in vitro fertilization treatments.
Observational study in JBRA assisted reproduction, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Oocyte maturation and pregnancy outcomes in relation to gonadotropin duration in antagonist cycles.Annals of medicine · 2026Article
- Relationship between anti-Müllerian hormone concentration in the peripheral blood of women and aneuploid pregnancy.BMC pregnancy and childbirth · 2026Article
- Impact of retrieved oocyte number on IVF outcomes in polycystic ovary syndrome: a retrospective cohort study.Journal of endocrinological investigation · 2026Article
- Polycystic ovary syndrome and excessive body weight impact independently and synergically on fertility treatment outcomes.Reproductive biology and endocrinology : RB&E · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo evaluate the correlation between serum anti-Müllerian hormone (AMH) and the number of oocytes retrieved after controlled ovarian stimulation for in vitro fertilization treatments and determine cut-off values predictive of poor and high response to stimulation.
methodsIt was performed a retrospective observational study that included 1003 cycles of controlled ovarian stimulation carried between February 2017 and December 2023 at a Medically Assisted Procreation Centre. The exclusion criteria were the following: serum AMH levels obtained more than 6 months prior to the start of the ovarian stimulation, the presence of a single ovary, non-Caucasian ethnicity, a controlled ovarian stimulation cycle performed for the purpose of oocyte donation or fertility preservation, a documented diagnosis of endometriosis, a documented history of ovarian surgery and the absence of essential data for the study in the medical records (absence of the number of oocytes obtained or the AMH value). Poor response to stimulation was defined as ≤ 3 oocytes retrieved, and high response was defined as > 15 oocytes. The correlation between variables was calculated using Spearman's correlation test and cut-off values were determined using ROC (Receiver Operating Characteristic) curves.
resultsAMH exhibited a significantly positive correlation with the number of oocytes retrieved (Spearman's correlation coefficient = 0.60, p<0.01). The predictive cut-off for poor ovarian response was 0.72 ng/mL (specificity of 95.13%, sensitivity of 43.23%), and the predictive cut-off for high ovarian response was 4.77 ng/mL (specificity of 89.86%, sensitivity of 38.22%).
conclusionsSerum AMH proved to be a good predictor of the ovarian response to controlled ovarian stimulation for in vitro fertilization treatments, which makes it useful in supporting clinical decision-making. However, it should not be used as an absolute discriminator of poor or high ovarian response.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.