ArticleMethods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.)2025
The Evolution of Nucleic Acid-Based Diagnosis Methods from the (pre-)CRISPR to CRISPR era and the Associated Machine/Deep Learning Approaches in Relevant RNA Design.
Article in Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Prime Editing, CRISPR-Cas9, and NanoCas Genome Editing for Cancer Treatment.Molecular biotechnology · 2026Review
- RNA design: update on computational frameworks and programs for inverse RNA folding.Briefings in bioinformatics · 2026Review
- Deep learning-driven prediction of on-target activity, off-target risk, and repair outcomes in CRISPR/Cas9: current landscape and multi-scale perspectives.Journal of translational medicine · 2026Review
- Population-specific MicroRNA biomarker discovery in breast ductal carcinoma via explainable graph neural multi-omics modeling.BMC cancer · 2026Article
- Cell lineage tracing: Methods, applications, and challenges.Quantitative biology (Beijing, China) · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Nucleic acid tests (NATs) are considered as gold standard in molecular diagnosis. To meet the demand for onsite, point-of-care, specific and sensitive, trace and genotype detection of pathogens and pathogenic variants, various types of NATs have been developed since the discovery of PCR. As alternatives to traditional NATs (e.g., PCR), isothermal nucleic acid amplification techniques (INAATs) such as LAMP, RPA, SDA, HDR, NASBA, and HCA were invented gradually. PCR and most of these techniques highly depend on efficient and optimal primer and probe design to deliver accurate and specific results. This chapter starts with a discussion of traditional NATs and INAATs in concert with the description of computational tools available to aid the process of primer/probe design for NATs and INAATs. Besides briefly covering nanoparticles-assisted NATs, a more comprehensive presentation is given on the role CRISPR-based technologies have played in molecular diagnosis. Here we provide examples of a few groundbreaking CRISPR assays that have been developed to counter epidemics and pandemics and outline CRISPR biology, highlighting the role of CRISPR guide RNA and its design in any successful CRISPR-based application. In this respect, we tabularize computational tools that are available to aid the design of guide RNAs in CRISPR-based applications. In the second part of our chapter, we discuss machine learning (ML)- and deep learning (DL)-based computational approaches that facilitate the design of efficient primer and probe for NATs/INAATs and guide RNAs for CRISPR-based applications. Given the role of microRNA (miRNAs) as potential future biomarkers of disease diagnosis, we have also discussed ML/DL-based computational approaches for miRNA-target predictions. Our chapter presents the evolution of nucleic acid-based diagnosis techniques from PCR and INAATs to more advanced CRISPR/Cas-based methodologies in concert with the evolution of deep learning (DL)- and machine learning (ml)-based computational tools in the most relevant application domains.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39312149What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.