Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39312149›Full record

ArticleMethods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.)2025

The Evolution of Nucleic Acid-Based Diagnosis Methods from the (pre-)CRISPR to CRISPR era and the Associated Machine/Deep Learning Approaches in Relevant RNA Design.

Shruti Sarika Chakraborty, Jayati Ray Dutta, Ramakrishnan Ganesan, Peter Minary

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Cell lineage tracing: Methods, applications, and challenges.Quantitative biology (Beijing, China) · 2025
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Shruti Sarika ChakrabortyDepartment of Computer Science, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK. shruti.chakraborty@lmh.ox.ac.uk.
Jayati Ray DuttaBITS Pilani Hyderabad Campus, Secunderabad, Telangana, India.
Ramakrishnan GanesanBITS Pilani Hyderabad Campus, Secunderabad, Telangana, India.
Peter MinaryDepartment of Computer Science, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK. peter.minary@cs.ox.ac.uk.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Nucleic acid tests (NATs) are considered as gold standard in molecular diagnosis. To meet the demand for onsite, point-of-care, specific and sensitive, trace and genotype detection of pathogens and pathogenic variants, various types of NATs have been developed since the discovery of PCR. As alternatives to traditional NATs (e.g., PCR), isothermal nucleic acid amplification techniques (INAATs) such as LAMP, RPA, SDA, HDR, NASBA, and HCA were invented gradually. PCR and most of these techniques highly depend on efficient and optimal primer and probe design to deliver accurate and specific results. This chapter starts with a discussion of traditional NATs and INAATs in concert with the description of computational tools available to aid the process of primer/probe design for NATs and INAATs. Besides briefly covering nanoparticles-assisted NATs, a more comprehensive presentation is given on the role CRISPR-based technologies have played in molecular diagnosis. Here we provide examples of a few groundbreaking CRISPR assays that have been developed to counter epidemics and pandemics and outline CRISPR biology, highlighting the role of CRISPR guide RNA and its design in any successful CRISPR-based application. In this respect, we tabularize computational tools that are available to aid the design of guide RNAs in CRISPR-based applications. In the second part of our chapter, we discuss machine learning (ML)- and deep learning (DL)-based computational approaches that facilitate the design of efficient primer and probe for NATs/INAATs and guide RNAs for CRISPR-based applications. Given the role of microRNA (miRNAs) as potential future biomarkers of disease diagnosis, we have also discussed ML/DL-based computational approaches for miRNA-target predictions. Our chapter presents the evolution of nucleic acid-based diagnosis techniques from PCR and INAATs to more advanced CRISPR/Cas-based methodologies in concert with the evolution of deep learning (DL)- and machine learning (ml)-based computational tools in the most relevant application domains.

Indexed as

Deep LearningClustered Regularly Interspaced Short Palindromic RepeatsCRISPR-Cas SystemsHumansMachine LearningMolecular Diagnostic TechniquesNucleic Acid Amplification TechniquesRNARNACas12Cas13Cas9CRISPR-based diagnosisCRISPR base editingCRISPR/CasCRISPR/Cas toolsCRISPR off-target efficiencyCRISPR on-target efficiencyCRISPR prime editingDeep learningGenotypingGuide RNAHCRHDALAMPMachine learningmiRNAMolecular diagnosisNanoparticlesNASBANucleic acid testingPCRPrimerPrimer designPrimer-design-toolsProbeRPASDA

Identifiers

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.