ArticleG3 (Bethesda, Md.)2024
Cross potential selection: a proposal for optimizing crossing combinations in recurrent selection using the usefulness criterion of future inbred lines.
Article in G3 (Bethesda, Md.), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Optimization of family sizes in sets of crosses with a greedy allocation strategy based on automatic differentiation.Frontiers in plant science · 2026Article
- DiffBreed: automatic differentiation enables efficient gradient-based optimization of breeding strategies.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2025Article
- Optimization of crossing strategy based on the usefulness criterion in interpopulation crosses considering different marker effects among populations.TAG. Theoretical and applied genetics. Theoretische und angewandte Genetik · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
In plant breeding programs, rapid production of novel varieties is highly desirable. Genomic selection allows the selection of superior individuals based on genomic estimated breeding values. However, it is worth noting that superior individuals may not always be superior parents. The choice of the crossing pair significantly influences the genotypic value of the resulting progeny. This study has introduced a new crossing strategy, termed cross potential selection, designed to expedite the production of novel varieties of inbred crops. Cross potential selection integrates fast recurrent selection and usefulness criterion to generate novel varieties. It considers the segregation of each crossing pair and computes the expected genotypic values of the top-performing individuals, assuming that the progeny distribution of genotypic values follows a normal distribution. It does not consider genetic diversity and focuses only on producing a novel variety as soon as possible. We simulated a 30-year breeding program in 2 scenarios, low heritability (h2=0.3) and high heritability (h2=0.6), to compare cross potential selection with 2 other selection strategies. Cross potential selection consistently demonstrated the highest genetic gains among the 3 strategies in early cycles. In the 3rd year of the breeding program with a high heritability (h2=0.6), cross potential selection exhibited the highest genetic gains, 138 times that of 300 independent breeding simulations. Regarding long-term improvement, the other selection strategies outperformed cross potential selection. Nevertheless, compared with the other 2 strategies, cross potential selection achieved significant short-term genetic improvements. Cross potential selection is a suitable breeding strategy for the rapid production of varieties within limited time and cost.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.