Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39313550›Full record

Trial reportJournal of human hypertension2024

Effects of dynamic, isometric, and combined resistance training on ambulatory blood pressure in treated men with hypertension: a randomized controlled trial.

Julio Cesar Silva de Sousa, Rafael Yokoyama Fecchio, Laura Oliveira-Silva, Andrea Pio-Abreu, Giovânio Vieira da Silva, Luciano F Drager, David A Low, Cláudia Lúcia de Moraes Forjaz

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in Journal of human hypertension, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. The efficacy of resistance training for the management of hypertension: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Postepy w kardiologii interwencyjnej = Advances in interventional cardiology · 2025
    Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Julio Cesar Silva de SousaExercise Hemodynamic Laboratory, School of Physical Education and Sport, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil. julio.sousaef@gmail.com.ORCID 0000-0002-8867-6202
Rafael Yokoyama FecchioExercise Hemodynamic Laboratory, School of Physical Education and Sport, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.
Laura Oliveira-SilvaExercise Hemodynamic Laboratory, School of Physical Education and Sport, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.
Andrea Pio-AbreuUnidade de Hipertensão, Disciplina de Nefrologia, Hospital das Clínicas HCFMUSP, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-5118-7990
Giovânio Vieira da SilvaUnidade de Hipertensão, Disciplina de Nefrologia, Hospital das Clínicas HCFMUSP, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0003-3370-9326
Luciano F DragerUnidade de Hipertensão, Disciplina de Nefrologia, Hospital das Clínicas HCFMUSP, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-2081-6846
David A LowResearch Institute of Sport and Exercise Sciences, Faculty of Science. Liverpool John Moores University, Liverpool, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-7677-8634
Cláudia Lúcia de Moraes ForjazExercise Hemodynamic Laboratory, School of Physical Education and Sport, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0001-7584-4265

Funding

Ministry of Science, Technology and Innovation | Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico (National Council for Scientific and Technological Development) 302309/2022-5Ministry of Science, Technology and Innovation | Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico (National Council for Scientific and Technological Development) 304436/2018-6
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Ambulatory blood pressure (ABP) monitoring is a widespread recommendation for the diagnosis and management of hypertension. Dynamic resistance training (DRT) and isometric handgrip training (IHT) have been recommended for hypertension treatment, but their effects on ABP have been poorly studied. Additionally, combined dynamic and isometric handgrip resistance training (CRT) could produce an additive effect that has yet to be tested. Thus, this randomized controlled trial was designed to evaluate the effects of DRT, IHT and CRT on mean ABP and ABP variability. Fifty-nine treated men with hypertension were randomly allocated to 1 of four groups: DRT (8 dynamic resistance exercises, 50% of 1RM, 3 sets until moderate fatigue), IHT (4 sets of 2 min of isometric handgrip at 30% of MVC), CRT (DRT + IHT) and control (CON - 30 min of stretching). Interventions occurred 3 times/week for 10 weeks, and ABP was assessed before and after the interventions. ANOVAs and ANCOVAs adjusted for pre-intervention values were employed for analysis. Mean 24-h, awake and asleep BPs did not change in either group throughout the study (all, P > 0.05). Nocturnal BP fall as well as the standard deviation, coefficient of variation and the average real variability of ABP also did not change significantly in either group (all, P < 0.05). Changes in all these parameters adjusted to the pre-intervention values were also similar among the four groups (all, p > 0.05). In treated men with hypertension, 10 weeks of DRT, IHT or CRT does not decrease ABP levels nor change ABP variability.

Indexed as

Blood PressureBlood Pressure Monitoring, AmbulatoryHypertensionResistance TrainingAdultAgedHand StrengthHumansIsometric ContractionMaleMiddle AgedTreatment Outcome

Identifiers

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.