Trial reportJournal of human hypertension2024
Effects of dynamic, isometric, and combined resistance training on ambulatory blood pressure in treated men with hypertension: a randomized controlled trial.
Trial report in Journal of human hypertension, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Isometric hand grip training on populations with different baseline resting blood pressure: a systematic review and meta-analysis.BMC public health · 2026Pooled it
- The Optimal Dosage of Isometric Handgrip Exercise for Blood Pressure Reduction: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Journal of clinical hypertension (Greenwich, Conn.) · 2026Pooled it
- Exercise Training Across the Hypertensive Heart Disease Continuum: Clinical Evidence and Implications for Prescription.Journal of cardiovascular development and disease · 2026Review
- Additional blood-pressure-lowering effect of exercise in adults on stable antihypertensive medication: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials.Hypertension research : official journal of the Japanese Society of Hypertension · 2026Review
- Effects of Resistance Training on Systolic and Diastolic Blood Pressure in Hypertensive Adults: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Review
- Effects of the Intensity, Duration, and Muscle Mass of Isometric Handgrip Exercise on Neuromuscular Fatigue and Post-Exercise Blood Pressure Responses: A Crossover Study.Health science reports · 2026Article
- The efficacy of resistance training for the management of hypertension: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Postepy w kardiologii interwencyjnej = Advances in interventional cardiology · 2025Review
- Aerobic, Resistance, and Isometric Exercise to Reduce Blood Pressure Variability: A Network Meta-Analysis of 15 Clinical Trials.Journal of clinical hypertension (Greenwich, Conn.) · 2025Review
- Effects of resistance training intensity on the cardiovascular health of postmenopausal women with hypertension: a study protocol for the LOAD trial.BMJ open sport & exercise medicine · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Ambulatory blood pressure (ABP) monitoring is a widespread recommendation for the diagnosis and management of hypertension. Dynamic resistance training (DRT) and isometric handgrip training (IHT) have been recommended for hypertension treatment, but their effects on ABP have been poorly studied. Additionally, combined dynamic and isometric handgrip resistance training (CRT) could produce an additive effect that has yet to be tested. Thus, this randomized controlled trial was designed to evaluate the effects of DRT, IHT and CRT on mean ABP and ABP variability. Fifty-nine treated men with hypertension were randomly allocated to 1 of four groups: DRT (8 dynamic resistance exercises, 50% of 1RM, 3 sets until moderate fatigue), IHT (4 sets of 2 min of isometric handgrip at 30% of MVC), CRT (DRT + IHT) and control (CON - 30 min of stretching). Interventions occurred 3 times/week for 10 weeks, and ABP was assessed before and after the interventions. ANOVAs and ANCOVAs adjusted for pre-intervention values were employed for analysis. Mean 24-h, awake and asleep BPs did not change in either group throughout the study (all, P > 0.05). Nocturnal BP fall as well as the standard deviation, coefficient of variation and the average real variability of ABP also did not change significantly in either group (all, P < 0.05). Changes in all these parameters adjusted to the pre-intervention values were also similar among the four groups (all, p > 0.05). In treated men with hypertension, 10 weeks of DRT, IHT or CRT does not decrease ABP levels nor change ABP variability.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39313550What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.