ArticlebioRxiv : the preprint server for biology2025
Predicting Task Activation Maps from Resting-State Functional Connectivity using Deep Learning.
Article in bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- GEMReg: a spatio-temporal grayordinate ensemble modelling framework for predicting task activation maps from resting-state fMRI.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
- Updated by
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Deep learning has been proven effective in predicting brain activation patterns from resting-state features. In this work, using resting state and task fMRI data from the Human Connectome Project (HCP), we replicate the state-of-the-art deep learning model BrainSurfCNN and examine new model architectures for improvement. We also examine the role of individual variability in model performance. Specifically, first, we replicated the BrainSurfCNN model and assessed how varying the input feature space impacts task contrast prediction. Second, we explored two architectural changes for improving model performance and scalability: adding a Squeeze-and-Excitation attention mechanism (BrainSERF) and using a graph neural network-based architecture (BrainSurfGCN). Third, we examined how model performance is impacted by individual variability in task performance and data quality. Overall, we present replication, potential avenues for improvements in performance and scalability, and a better understanding of how individual variability impacts prediction performance - all in the hope of advancing deep learning applications in neuroimaging.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.