Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39314550›Full record

ArticleJHEP reports : innovation in hepatology2024

Regulation of intestinal senescence during cholestatic liver disease modulates barrier function and liver disease progression.

Mar Moreno-Gonzalez, Katherine Hampton, Paula Ruiz, Gemma Beasy, Falk Sp Nagies, Aimee Parker, James Lazenby, Caitlin Bone, Ane Alava-Arteaga, Meha Patel and 9 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JHEP reports : innovation in hepatology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

19 authors.

Mar Moreno-GonzalezGut Microbes and Health Institute Strategic Programme, Quadram Institute Bioscience, Norwich Research Park, Norwich, UK.
Katherine HamptonGut Microbes and Health Institute Strategic Programme, Quadram Institute Bioscience, Norwich Research Park, Norwich, UK.
Paula RuizGut Microbes and Health Institute Strategic Programme, Quadram Institute Bioscience, Norwich Research Park, Norwich, UK.
Gemma BeasyGut Microbes and Health Institute Strategic Programme, Quadram Institute Bioscience, Norwich Research Park, Norwich, UK.
Falk Sp NagiesFood, Microbiome and Health Institute Strategic Programme, Quadram Institute Bioscience, Norwich Research Park, Norwich, UK.
Aimee ParkerGut Microbes and Health Institute Strategic Programme, Quadram Institute Bioscience, Norwich Research Park, Norwich, UK.
James LazenbyScience Operations, Quadram Institute Bioscience, Norwich Research Park, Norwich, UK.
Caitlin BoneGut Microbes and Health Institute Strategic Programme, Quadram Institute Bioscience, Norwich Research Park, Norwich, UK.
Ane Alava-ArteagaGut Microbes and Health Institute Strategic Programme, Quadram Institute Bioscience, Norwich Research Park, Norwich, UK.
Meha PatelGut Microbes and Health Institute Strategic Programme, Quadram Institute Bioscience, Norwich Research Park, Norwich, UK.
Charlotte HellmichCentre for Metabolic Health, Faculty of Medicine, University of East Anglia, Norwich Research Park, Norwich, UK.
Pablo Luri-MartinGut Microbes and Health Institute Strategic Programme, Quadram Institute Bioscience, Norwich Research Park, Norwich, UK.
Ece SilanFood, Microbiome and Health Institute Strategic Programme, Quadram Institute Bioscience, Norwich Research Park, Norwich, UK.
Mark PhiloScience Operations, Quadram Institute Bioscience, Norwich Research Park, Norwich, UK.
David BakerScience Operations, Quadram Institute Bioscience, Norwich Research Park, Norwich, UK.
Simon M RushbrookCentre for Metabolic Health, Faculty of Medicine, University of East Anglia, Norwich Research Park, Norwich, UK.
Falk HildebrandGut Microbes and Health Institute Strategic Programme, Quadram Institute Bioscience, Norwich Research Park, Norwich, UK.
Stuart A RushworthCentre for Metabolic Health, Faculty of Medicine, University of East Anglia, Norwich Research Park, Norwich, UK.
Naiara BerazaGut Microbes and Health Institute Strategic Programme, Quadram Institute Bioscience, Norwich Research Park, Norwich, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background & Aims: Senescence has been reported to have differential functions in cholangiocytes and hepatic stellate cells (HSCs) during human and murine cholestatic disease, being detrimental in biliary cells and anti-fibrotic in HSCs. Cholestatic liver disease is associated with loss of intestinal barrier function and changes in the microbiome, the mechanistic cause of which is undetermined. Methods: Intestinal samples were analysed from controls and patients with primary sclerosing cholangitis, as well as wild-type (WT) and p16-3MR transgenic mice. Cholestatic liver disease was induced by bile duct ligation (BDL) and DDC diet feeding. Fexaramine was used as an intestinal-restricted FXR agonist and antibiotics were given to eliminate the intestinal microbiome. Senescent cells were eliminated in p16-3MR mice with ganciclovir and in WT mice with the senolytic drug ABT-263. Results: Herein, we show increased senescence in intestinal epithelial cells (IECs) in patients with primary sclerosing cholangitis and in mice after BDL and DDC diet feeding. Intestinal senescence was increased in response to reduced exposure to bile acids and increased presence of lipopolysaccharide Conclusions: Senescence occurs in IECs during cholestatic disease and the elimination of senescent cells has a detrimental impact on the gut-liver axis. Our results point to cell-specific rather than systemic targeting of senescence as a therapeutic approach to treat cholestatic liver disease. Impact and implications: Cholestatic liver disease associates with the dysregulation of intestinal barrier function, while the mechanisms mediating the disruption of the gut-liver axis remain largely undefined. Here, we demonstrate that senescence, a cellular response to stress, is activated in intestinal cells during cholestatic liver disease in humans and mice. Mechanistically, we demonstrate that the reduction of bile acids and the increased presence of bacterial products mediate the activation of intestinal senescence during cholestatic liver disease. Importantly, the elimination of these senescent cells promotes further damage to the intestine that aggravates liver disease, with increased tissue damage and fibrosis. Our results provide evidence that therapeutic strategies to treat cholestatic liver disease by eliminating senescent cells may have unwanted effects in the intestine and support the need to develop cell/organ-specific approaches.

Indexed as

cholestasisintestineliverSenescencesenolytics

Identifiers

PMID39314550
PMCPMC11418120

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.