Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39315573›Full record

ArticleHealth expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy2024

From Hospital to Home: Applying a Co-Design Approach to Determine the Key Components of an Intervention to Support Transition-To-Home After Stroke.

Geraldine O'Callaghan, Martin Fahy, Patricia Hall, Deirdre McCartan, Peter Langhorne, Rose Galvin, Frances Horgan

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Bridging the Gap: Developing a Co-Designed Resource to Support the Hospital-to-Home Transition Following Limb Loss.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2026
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Geraldine O'CallaghaniPASTAR Collaborative Doctoral Award Programme, School of Population Health, RCSI University of Medicine and Health Sciences, Dublin, Ireland.ORCID 0000-0002-8163-7892
Martin FahyiPASTAR Collaborative Doctoral Award Programme, School of Population Health, RCSI University of Medicine and Health Sciences, Dublin, Ireland.
Patricia HalliPASTAR Collaborative Doctoral Award Programme, School of Population Health, RCSI University of Medicine and Health Sciences, Dublin, Ireland.
Deirdre McCartaniPASTAR Collaborative Doctoral Award Programme, School of Population Health, RCSI University of Medicine and Health Sciences, Dublin, Ireland.
Peter LanghorneSchool of Cardiovascular and Metabolic Health (SCMH), University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK.
Rose GalvinSchool of Allied Health, Faculty of Education and Health Sciences, Ageing Research Centre, Health Research Institute, University of Limerick, Limerick, Ireland.
Frances HorganiPASTAR Collaborative Doctoral Award Programme, School of Physiotherapy, RCSI University of Medicine and Health Sciences, Dublin, Ireland.

Funding

This study was supported by the Health Research Board (HRB) in Ireland through the Collaborative Doctoral Award Scheme (iPASTAR-Improving Pathways for Acute STroke And Rehabilitation) (HRB-CDA-2019-004).
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPeople with stroke and their families face numerous challenges as they leave hospital to return home, often experiencing multifaceted unmet needs and feelings of abandonment. The essential elements of an intervention intended to support transition-to-home after stroke are unclear.

objectiveThe aim of the project was to engage in a co-design process to identify the key components of a pragmatic intervention to inform a transition-to-home support pathway following stroke. MATERIALS AND

methodsThe study was conducted using a co-design process engaging multiple stakeholders, including 12 people with stroke, 6 caregivers, 26 healthcare professionals and 6 individuals from stroke organisations in a series of three workshops, facilitated by the primary researcher, a wider team of researchers and an individual with lived experience of stroke. World Café methodology and Liberating Structures facilitation techniques were adapted to meet the aim of the workshops. Data collection involved observations during workshops, followed by summarising of findings and reaching group consensus agreement on outputs. Facilitated consensus on a prioritisation task resulted in the final output.

resultsThe co-design group identified 10 key intervention components of a transition-to-home support pathway following stroke. These components focussed on enhancing collaboration, streamlining transition processes and facilitating post-discharge support. While a stroke coordinator was considered a top priority, increased cross-setting information sharing and community in-reach, where community-based healthcare staff extended their services into hospital settings to provide continuity care, were considered most feasible to implement.

conclusionThe co-design approach, involving a multi-stakeholder group and strengthened by patient and public involvement, ensured that the identified transition-to-home intervention components are meaningful and relevant for people with stroke and their families. Further co-design workshops are required to refine, and feasibility test the components for generalisability within the wider Irish healthcare setting. PATIENT OR PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION: Individuals who have experienced a stroke actively contributed to shaping the methodological design of this study and the ethics process. They engaged in the analysis of co-design outputs and provided input for the discussion and recommendations regarding future research. An individual who had experienced a stroke formed part of the research team, co-facilitating the co-design workshops and co-authoring this article.

Indexed as

Stroke RehabilitationCaregiversFemaleHealth PersonnelHome Care ServicesHumansMalePatient DischargeStrokeco‐design processhospital‐to‐homepatient and public involvement and engagementstroketransition

Identifiers

PMID39315573
PMCPMC11420660

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.