Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39317944›Full record

ArticleGenomics, proteomics & bioinformatics2024

Evaluating Performance of Different RNA Secondary Structure Prediction Programs Using Self-cleaving Ribozymes.

Fei Qi, Junjie Chen, Yue Chen, Jianfeng Sun, Yiting Lin, Zipeng Chen, Philipp Kapranov

Abstract readEvaluation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Genomics, proteomics & bioinformatics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Fei QiState Key Laboratory of Cellular Stress Biology, School of Life Sciences, Faculty of Medicine and Life Sciences, Xiamen University, Xiamen 361102, China.ORCID 0000-0003-4578-0146
Junjie ChenInstitute of Genomics, School of Medicine, Huaqiao University, Xiamen 361021, China.ORCID 0000-0003-3386-5759
Yue ChenInstitute of Genomics, School of Medicine, Huaqiao University, Xiamen 361021, China.ORCID 0000-0002-1799-6647
Jianfeng SunBotnar Research Centre, University of Oxford, Oxford, OX3 7LD, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-1274-5080
Yiting LinInstitute of Genomics, School of Medicine, Huaqiao University, Xiamen 361021, China.ORCID 0000-0001-8014-0449
Zipeng ChenInstitute of Genomics, School of Medicine, Huaqiao University, Xiamen 361021, China.ORCID 0000-0002-8257-3165
Philipp KapranovState Key Laboratory of Cellular Stress Biology, School of Life Sciences, Faculty of Medicine and Life Sciences, Xiamen University, Xiamen 361102, China.ORCID 0000-0003-2647-4856

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Accurate identification of the correct, biologically relevant RNA structures is critical to understanding various aspects of RNA biology since proper folding represents the key to the functionality of all types of RNA molecules and plays pivotal roles in many essential biological processes. Thus, a plethora of approaches have been developed to predict, identify, or solve RNA structures based on various computational, molecular, genetic, chemical, or physicochemical strategies. Purely computational approaches hold distinct advantages over all other strategies in terms of the ease of implementation, time, speed, cost, and throughput, but they strongly underperform in terms of accuracy that significantly limits their broader application. Nonetheless, the advantages of these methods led to a steady development of multiple in silico RNA secondary structure prediction approaches including recent deep learning-based programs. Here, we compared the accuracy of predictions of biologically relevant secondary structures of dozens of self-cleaving ribozyme sequences using seven in silico RNA folding prediction tools with tasks of varying complexity. We found that while many programs performed well in relatively simple tasks, their performance varied significantly in more complex RNA folding problems. However, in general, a modern deep learning method outperformed the other programs in the complex tasks in predicting the RNA secondary structures, at least based on the specific class of sequences tested, suggesting that it may represent the future of RNA structure prediction algorithms.

Indexed as

Nucleic Acid ConformationRNA, CatalyticRNA FoldingComputational BiologyComputer SimulationDeep LearningRNASoftwareRNARNA, CatalyticDeep learningPseudoknotRibozymeRNA secondary structureRNA secondary structure prediction

Identifiers

PMID39317944
PMCPMC12016570

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.