Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39317987›Full record

ArticleObstetrics & gynecology science2024

Navigating the thyroid-gynecologic interplay: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Heba Ramadan

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Obstetrics & gynecology science, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Heba RamadanDepartment of Pharmacy, Agamy Medical District, Ministry of Health and Population, Alexandria, Egypt.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Thyroid disorders are considered to be linked to various health issues, including gynecologic cancers. Studying this association is crucial in clinical practice. This approach was applied through searches in Scopus, WOS, PubMed, and Google Scholar. A Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses checklist was followed. The quality assessment was checked. The meta-analyses were performed using R-4.3.2 (R Core Team, Vienna, Austria) and SPSS version 28 (SPSS Inc., Armonk, NY, USA). The results demonstrated that 19 studies investigated the association between thyroid disorders and gynecologic cancers in adult females. The studies were categorized into two groups: group 1 examined thyroid status in various gynecologic cancers, while group 2 comprised casecontrol studies examining gynecologic cancer incidence in females with thyroid disorders compared to control. Among females with gynecologic cancers, 13% (95% confidence interval [CI], 10-17%) had hypothyroidism. When comparing hypothyroidism and hyperthyroidism across studies, the overall percentage for hypothyroidism was 14% (95% CI, 9-22%), while for hyperthyroidism, it was 3% (95% CI, 2-5%). The odds ratio for hypothyroidism in females with uterine cancer was 2.65 (P<0.05). Additionally, hypothyroidism showed a significant risk ratio of 1.3 (P<0.05) for different gynecologic cancers. However, hyperthyroidism was significantly associated with increased ovarian cancer mortality (risk ratio [RR], 2.14; P=0.03); conversely, hypothyroidism showed no significant relationship (RR, 1.35; P=0.26). The findings concluded that hypothyroidism is significantly associated with various gynecologic cancers, suggesting a potential role in its pathogenesis. Conversely, hyperthyroidism is linked to an increased risk of ovarian cancer mortality. Further research is needed to clarify whether hyperthyroidism predisposes females to ovarian cancer.

Indexed as

Gynecologic cancersHyperthyroidismHypothyroidismSystematic reviewThyroid disorders

Identifiers

PMID39317987
PMCPMC11581810

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.