ReviewCurrent gene therapy2025
Target and Gene-Based Therapeutic Strategies against Pancreatic Cancer: Current and Future Prospects.
Review in Current gene therapy, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Breast Cancer: Epidemiology, Molecular Classification, Diagnostics and Evolving Treatment Paradigms.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Establishment and validation of a prognostic model for pancreatic cancer utilizing genes of tumor-associated neutrophils.Discover oncology · 2026Article
- The dual role of the Notch signaling pathway in digestive system cancers.European journal of medical research · 2026Review
- Prognostic and Immunological Value of CTNNB1 in Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma: A Comprehensive NGS and Multicomponent Analysis.Genetics research · 2026Article
- Gene Therapy: Transforming the Battle Against Pancreatic Cancer.Current gene therapy · 2026Review
- Potential value of m6A-related lncRNAs in diagnosis and therapy of pancreatic cancer.Discover oncology · 2025Article
- Gut-to-tumor translocation of multidrug-resistantFrontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Despite tremendous advancements in knowledge, diagnosis, and availability of both traditional and innovative treatments, pancreatic cancer remains a dangerous disease with a high death rate and dismal prognosis. The traditional strategy in adjuvant and palliative settings is still cytotoxic chemotherapy predicated on the purine derivative gemcitabine; nevertheless, there is an increasing need for new medicines that target the primary molecular pathways and pathophysiological abnormalities implicated. There is now just a tiny amount of evidence of therapeutic benefit when the targeted drug erlotinib is added to the conventional gemcitabine treatment. In preclinical and clinical trials, novel medications targeting mTOR, NF-κB, and proteasome, including the enzyme histone deacetylase, are currently being studied alongside the well-established monoclonal antibody treatments and small-molecule protein tyrosine kinase inhibitors. These novel medications may change the negative natural progression of this illness in conjunction with gene therapy and immunotherapy, both of which are undergoing clinical study. In this regard, leveraging miRNA manipulation to combat cancer is appealing due to its promise to deliver personalized treatment tailored to an individual's distinct gene or miRNA expression profile. Preclinical studies involving animals have showcased the effectiveness of miRNA-based therapies, with several of these treatments now progressing into human clinical trials for various malignancies and other medical conditions. This review describes the important developments of targeted therapeutics that are associated with pancreatic cancer and the discoveries which can help in dealing with this fatal malignancy in a more significant manner.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39318213What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.