ArticleEuropean heart journal. Imaging methods and practice2024
A simplified approach to discriminate between healthy subjects and patients with heart failure using cardiac magnetic resonance myocardial deformation imaging.
Article in European heart journal. Imaging methods and practice, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07185100 (A Prospective, Cross-sectional, Nationwide Community-based Observational Study to Determine the Prevalence of Unrecognized Heart Failure Among Patients at Risk in Urban Areas Across Germany Using CMR), which is not on this map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
A Prospective, Cross-sectional, Nationwide Community-based Observational Study to Determine the Prevalence of Unrecognized Heart Failure Among Patients at Risk in Urban Areas Across Germany Using CMR
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Design and rationale of the WE-CARE-HF-CMR trial: Cardiorenal care on wheels for asymptomatic heart failure patients (NCT07185100).Journal of cardiovascular magnetic resonance : official journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance · 2026Article
- A multicenter study on the comparability of myocardial strain values acquired with different CMR scanners and analyzed with different post-processing software: insights into the "Traveling Volunteers" study.International journal of computer assisted radiology and surgery · 2026Article
- Reference Values for Myocardial Strain by Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Feature Tracking: Insights From Healthy Volunteers and Heart Failure Patients Using Caas MR.Reviews in cardiovascular medicine · 2026Article
- Cardiac MRI in diabetic cardiomyopathy: translating imaging biomarkers into clinical practice.Cardiovascular diabetology · 2025Review
- Myocardial fibrosis, the silent instigator of diastolic dysfunction in patients with rheumatoid arthritis.Physiological research · 2025Review
- Exercise cardiovascular magnetic resonance myocardial dynamic index: A non-invasive imaging marker associated with cardiac dyspnea.Journal of cardiovascular magnetic resonance : official journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
18 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Aims: Left ventricular global longitudinal strain (LV-GLS) shows promise as a marker to detect early heart failure (HF). This study sought to (i) establish cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (CMR)-derived LV-GLS cut-offs to differentiate healthy from HF for both acquisition-based and post-processing techniques, (ii) assess agreement, and (iii) provide a method to convert LV-GLS between both techniques. Methods and results: A secondary analysis of a prospective study enrolling healthy subjects ( Conclusion: LV-GLS distinguishes healthy from HF with high accuracy. Each measurement technique requires distinct cut-offs, but rescaling factors facilitate conversion. An FT-based LV-GLS ≥ -15% simplifies HF detection in clinical routine.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.