ReviewCureus2024
Current Advances in Patient-Perceived Quality Assessment Within Romanian Healthcare.
Review in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Institutional Surveys and the Patient Feedback Mechanism in a Romanian Public Emergency Hospital: A Longitudinal Comparative Analysis, 2019-2024.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The global healthcare landscape is shifting toward patient-centered care, emphasizing the integration of patient feedback into service delivery. Romania, aligning with this trend, has implemented patient-perceived quality assessment tools to enhance healthcare services and better meet patient needs and expectations. This study aims to review comprehensively the implementation and impact of these tools in Romania, focusing on their role in improving healthcare quality. By examining key assessment instruments such as the Patient Satisfaction Questionnaire (PSQ), the Service Quality (SERVQUAL) model, and the Romanian Healthcare Quality Assessment Survey (RHQAS), the research seeks to understand how these tools have been used to identify areas for improvement and drive advancements in patient care. Employing a comprehensive review methodology, the study will conduct a thorough literature search to identify relevant studies, reports, and publications, analyzing the PSQ, SERVQUAL, and RHQAS in detail to understand their measurement domains, psychometric properties, and application within Romania. Additionally, qualitative data from interviews with healthcare providers and patients may be collected to offer further insights into the use and effectiveness of these tools. The study's findings are expected to provide valuable insights into the role of patient-perceived quality assessment tools in enhancing healthcare in Romania, identifying strengths, weaknesses, and opportunities for improvement. The results will highlight the effectiveness of combining international methodologies with localized adaptations to address the specific needs of the Romanian healthcare system, ultimately contributing to the ongoing efforts to improve patient satisfaction and health outcomes by informing the development and refinement of patient-centered care initiatives in Romania.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.