Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39318686›Full record

ArticleEuropean heart journal. Digital health2024

Long-term adherence to a wearable for continuous behavioural activity measuring in the SafeHeart implantable cardioverter defibrillator population.

Diana My Frodi, Maarten Z H Kolk, Joss Langford, Reinoud Knops, Hanno L Tan, Tariq Osman Andersen, Peter Karl Jacobsen, Niels Risum, Jesper Hastrup Svendsen, Fleur V Y Tjong and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European heart journal. Digital health, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Digital signatures of fatigue and wearing-off symptoms in patients with multiple sclerosis under natalizumab.Neurotherapeutics : the journal of the American Society for Experimental NeuroTherapeutics · 2026
    Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Diana My FrodiDepartment of Cardiology, Copenhagen University Hospital-Rigshospitalet, Inge Lehmanns Vej 7, DK-2100 Copenhagen, Denmark.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7074-5575
Maarten Z H KolkDepartment of Clinical and Experimental Cardiology, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Meibergdreef 9, 1105 AZ Amsterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0624-1510
Joss LangfordActivinsights Ltd, 6 Nene Road, Bicton Industrial Park, Kimbolton, Cambridgeshire, PE28 0LF, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3204-5866
Reinoud KnopsDepartment of Clinical and Experimental Cardiology, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Meibergdreef 9, 1105 AZ Amsterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0772-3573
Hanno L TanDepartment of Clinical and Experimental Cardiology, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Meibergdreef 9, 1105 AZ Amsterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7905-5818
Tariq Osman AndersenDepartment of Computer Science, University of Copenhagen, Universitetsparken 1, DK-2100 Copenhagen, Denmark.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9342-5520
Peter Karl JacobsenDepartment of Cardiology, Copenhagen University Hospital-Rigshospitalet, Inge Lehmanns Vej 7, DK-2100 Copenhagen, Denmark.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1520-8774
Niels RisumDepartment of Cardiology, Copenhagen University Hospital-Rigshospitalet, Inge Lehmanns Vej 7, DK-2100 Copenhagen, Denmark.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0357-9164
Jesper Hastrup SvendsenDepartment of Cardiology, Copenhagen University Hospital-Rigshospitalet, Inge Lehmanns Vej 7, DK-2100 Copenhagen, Denmark.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8466-8515
Fleur V Y TjongDepartment of Clinical and Experimental Cardiology, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Meibergdreef 9, 1105 AZ Amsterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9608-0081
Søren Zöga DiederichsenDepartment of Cardiology, Copenhagen University Hospital-Rigshospitalet, Inge Lehmanns Vej 7, DK-2100 Copenhagen, Denmark.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9687-0857

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Aims: Wearable health technologies are increasingly popular. Yet, wearable monitoring only works when devices are worn as intended, and adherence reporting lacks standardization. In this study, we aimed to explore the long-term adherence to a wrist-worn activity tracker in the prospective SafeHeart study and identify patient characteristics associated with adherence. Methods and results: This study enrolled 303 participants, instructed to wear a wrist-worn accelerometer day and night for 6 months. Long-term adherence was defined as valid days (≥22 h of wear time) divided by expected days, and daily adherence as mean hours of wear time per 24 h period. Optimal, moderate, and low long-term and daily adherence groups were defined as long-term adherence above or below 95 and 75% and daily adherence above or below 90 and 75%. Regression models were used to identify patient characteristics associated with long-term adherence. In total, 296 participants [median age 64 years; interquartile range (IQR) 57-72; 19% female] were found eligible, yielding 44 003 days for analysis. The median long-term adherence was 88.2% (IQR 74.6-96.5%). A total of 83 (28%), 127 (42.9%), and 86 (29.1%) participants had optimal, moderate, and low long-term adherence, and 163 (55.1%), 87 (29.4%), and 46 (15.5%) had optimal, moderate, and low daily adherence, respectively. Age and smoking habits differed significantly between adherence levels, and increasing changeover intervals improved the degree of long-term adherence. Conclusion: Long-term adherence to a wearable activity tracker was 88.2% over a 6-month period. Older age and longer changeover interval were positively associated with long-term adherence. This serves as a benchmark for future studies that rely on wearable devices. Trial registration number: The National Trial Registration number: NL9218 (https://onderzoekmetmensen.nl/).

Indexed as

Activity trackerAdherenceImplantable cardioverter defibrillatorLong termPredictionWearable

Identifiers

PMID39318686
PMCPMC11417489

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.