ArticleEuropean heart journal. Digital health2024
Predicting early-stage coronary artery disease using machine learning and routine clinical biomarkers improved by augmented virtual data.
Article in European heart journal. Digital health, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed.
- Advanced detection of coronary artery disease using a GAN-transformer model on plasma cytokine profiles.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- DynamX Bioadaptor as an Emerging and Promising Innovation in Interventional Cardiology.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Artificial intelligence in coronary artery calcification scoring: Current progress and future directions.Global cardiology science & practice · 2025Review
- Current and future role of biomarkers in the monitoring and prognosis of coronary artery disease.Future cardiology · 2025Article
- Morbidity-bridging metabolic pathways: linking early cardiovascular disease risk and depression symptoms using a multi-modal approach.European heart journal open · 2025Article
- Role of biomechanical factors in plaque rupture and erosion: insight from intravascular imaging based computational modeling.NPJ cardiovascular health · 2025Review
- Coronary heart disease risk prediction based on GAIN imputation and interpretable machine learning.Frontiers in genetics · 2025Article
- Deep learning-based multimodal risk stratification for atherosclerosis management.Archives of medical science : AMS · 2025Article
- Coronary artery disease prediction using Bayesian-optimized support vector machine with feature selection.Frontiers in network physiology · 2025Article
- Lipoproteins predicting coronary lesion complexity in premature coronary artery disease: a supervised machine learning approach.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Aims: Coronary artery disease (CAD) is a highly prevalent disease with modifiable risk factors. In patients with suspected obstructive CAD, evaluating the pre-test probability model is crucial for diagnosis, although its accuracy remains controversial. Machine learning (ML) predictive models can help clinicians detect CAD early and improve outcomes. This study aimed to identify early-stage CAD using ML in conjunction with a panel of clinical and laboratory tests. Methods and results: The study sample included 3316 patients enrolled in the Ludwigshafen Risk and Cardiovascular Health (LURIC) study. A comprehensive array of attributes was considered, and an ML pipeline was developed. Subsequently, we utilized five approaches to generating high-quality virtual patient data to improve the performance of the artificial intelligence models. An extension study was carried out using data from the Young Finns Study (YFS) to assess the results' generalizability. Upon applying virtual augmented data, accuracy increased by approximately 5%, from 0.75 to -0.79 for random forests (RFs), and from 0.76 to -0.80 for Gradient Boosting (GB). Sensitivity showed a significant boost for RFs, rising by about 9.4% (0.81-0.89), while GB exhibited a 4.8% increase (0.83-0.87). Specificity showed a significant boost for RFs, rising by ∼24% (from 0.55 to 0.70), while GB exhibited a 37% increase (from 0.51 to 0.74). The extension analysis aligned with the initial study. Conclusion: Accurate predictions of angiographic CAD can be obtained using a set of routine laboratory markers, age, sex, and smoking status, holding the potential to limit the need for invasive diagnostic techniques. The extension analysis in the YFS demonstrated the potential of these findings in a younger population, and it confirmed applicability to atherosclerotic vascular disease.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.