Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39318722›Full record

ReviewToxicology reports2024

An overview of immune checkpoint inhibitor toxicities in bladder cancer.

Avenie Mavadia, Sunyoung Choi, Ayden Ismail, Aruni Ghose, Joecelyn Kirani Tan, Vasileios Papadopoulos, Elisabet Sanchez, Stergios Boussios

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Toxicology reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Development and Validation of a Competitive Risk Model in Elderly Patients with Transitional Cell Bladder Carcinoma.Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Avenie MavadiaGKT School of Medicine, King's College London, London SE1 9RT, UK.
Sunyoung ChoiHampshire Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Aldermaston Road, Basingstoke, Hampshire RG24 9NA, UK.
Ayden IsmailGKT School of Medicine, King's College London, London SE1 9RT, UK.
Aruni GhoseDepartment of Medical Oncology, Barts Cancer Centre, St Bartholomew's Hospital, Barts Heath NHS Trust, London EC1A 7BE, UK.
Joecelyn Kirani TanSchool of Medicine, University of St. Andrews, North Haugh, Fife, Scotland KY16 9TF, UK.
Vasileios PapadopoulosKent and Canterbury Hospital, Ethelbert Road, Canterbury CT1 3NG, UK.
Elisabet SanchezDepartment of Medical Oncology, Medway NHS Foundation Trust, Windmill Road, Gillingham ME7 5NY, UK.
Stergios BoussiosDepartment of Medical Oncology, Medway NHS Foundation Trust, Windmill Road, Gillingham ME7 5NY, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Bladder cancer is the tenth most prevalent malignancy worldwide, with a significant mortality burden. Urothelial carcinoma (UC) is the most common histological subtype, and treatment options are guided by whether the disease is muscle-invasive (MIBC) or non-muscle-invasive (NMIBC), with subsequent risk group stratification. The growing popularity of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) to treat MIBC and NMIBC as either monotherapy or combined with intravesical agents, may radically change the treatment paradigm of UC. Current treatments for NMBIC includes intravesical chemotherapy after trans-urethral resection of the bladder tumour, intravesical bacillus Calmette-Guerin (BCG) or radical cystectomy. Cisplatin-based chemotherapy is widely regarded as the first-line treatment for metastatic UC due to its beneficial response and survival rates when compared to alternative therapies. However, up to 70 % of metastatic UC patients are ineligible, and the prognosis of these patients remains poor, with a median survival of 13-16 months. For NMIBC and MIBC, ICIs provide a promising alternative for cisplatin-ineligible patients. In UC, ICIs including atezolizumab, nivolumab, avelumab, and pembrolizumab are Food and Drug Administration (FDA)-approved for monotherapy, and have demonstrated promising results, particularly in those who cannot receive cisplatin-based chemotherapy, and as a second-line treatment option for recurrent UC following platinum-based chemotherapy. It is important to consider that some patients may experience adverse events (AEs) with limited clinical benefit. Infusion-related reactions and immune-mediated AEs (imAEs) such as colitis, endocrinopathies, hepatitis, pneumonitis, interstitial lung disease, renal dysfunction, nephritis, cutaneous and neurological toxicities must be monitored for. Currently, there is no clear consensus on the role of a 'two-year stopping rule' in reducing the risk of imAEs, with further research on the optimal treatment duration of ICIs required. With increased ICI use, vigilance regarding their side effects is imperative. This review aims to provide an updated overview of ICI toxicities in bladder cancer, to assist clinicians in their therapeutic decision-making, with consideration of patient characteristics and the clinical context.

Indexed as

Bladder CancerCTLA-4Immune Checkpoint InhibitorPD-1PD-L1Toxicity

Identifiers

PMID39318722
PMCPMC11420502

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.