Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39320645›Full record

SynthesisBreast cancer (Tokyo, Japan)2024

Breast cancer drugs: FDA approval, development time, efficacy, clinical benefits, innovation, trials, endpoints, quality of life, value, and price.

Julia Caroline Michaeli, Thomas Michaeli, Dario Trapani, Sebastian Albers, Dominik Dannehl, Rachel Würstlein, Daniel Tobias Michaeli

Abstract readMeta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Breast cancer (Tokyo, Japan), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Drug repurposing of natural depsipeptide fromFrontiers in pharmacology · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Julia Caroline MichaeliDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, LMU University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6484-7161
Thomas MichaeliDepartment of Personalized Oncology, University Hospital Mannheim, Heidelberg University, Mannheim, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0293-9401
Dario TrapaniEuropean Institute of Oncology, IRCCS, Milan, Italy.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1672-9560
Sebastian AlbersDepartment of Orthopaedics and Sport Orthopaedics, School of Medicine, Klinikum Rechts Der Isar, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6688-764X
Dominik DannehlDepartment of Women's Health, Tuebingen University Hospital, Tübingen, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7653-8283
Rachel WürstleinDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, LMU University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany.
Daniel Tobias MichaeliDepartment of Medical Oncology, National Center for Tumor Diseases, Heidelberg University Hospital, Im Neuenheimer Feld 460, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany. danielmichaeli@yahoo.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2913-1867

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThis study analyzes the development, benefits, trial evidence, and price of new breast cancer drugs with US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approval.

methodsWe identified 26 drugs with 42 FDA-approved indications for early and metastatic breast cancer (2000-2023). Data were collected from FDA labels, clinicaltrials.gov, and Medicare and Medicaid. Overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) hazard ratios (HRs) and tumor response's relative risk (RR) alongside objective response rate (ORR) were meta-analyzed.

resultsThe median development time for breast cancer drugs was 7.8 years (95% CI 6.2-10.8). 26% of treatments were considered innovative ("first-in-indication") with 88% acting via a targeted mechanism. 64% were small molecules, 19% antibodies, and 18% antibody-drug conjugates. 38% were approved for HR + and 31% for HER2 + breast cancer. 6 indications were for early and 36 for metastatic breast cancer. Indications utilized FDA's special programs: orphan (2%), fast track (24%), accelerated approval (19%), priority review (74%), breakthrough therapy (44%). Approval was predominantly supported by phase 3 trials (88%) of randomized controlled design (66%), enrolling a median of 585 patients (IQR 417-752) at 181 centers (IQR 142-223) across 19 countries (IQR 17-20). New drugs' HR were 0.78 for OS (95% CI 0.74-0.82) and 0.59 for PFS (95% CI 0.54-0.64) with a RR for tumor response of 1.61 (95% CI 1.46-1.76). Median improvements of OS were 2.8 months (IQR 1.8-5.8) and PFS were 4.4 months (IQR 2.2-7.1). In single-arm trials, the average ORR was 31% (95% CI 10-53). In meta-regressions, the correlation between OS/PFS was 0.34 (p = 0.031) and OS/response was 0.01 (p = 0.435). 60% of treatments had a 'high-value' ESMO-MCBS score with 14% demonstrating improvements in quality of life. The median price was $16,013 per month (95% CI 13,097-17,617). There was no association between prices and patient benefit. The median value per life year gained was $62,419 (IQR 25,840-86,062).

conclusionsOver the past two decades, the development of innovative and effective drugs transformed the treatment landscape for breast cancer patients. Yet, investigators and regulators must safeguard that highly-priced new drugs demonstrate improvements in patient-centered clinical endpoints: overall survival and quality of life.

Indexed as

Antineoplastic AgentsBreast NeoplasmsDrug ApprovalQuality of LifeUnited States Food and Drug AdministrationClinical Trials as TopicFemaleHumansProgression-Free SurvivalUnited StatesAntineoplastic AgentsAntibodyAntibody-drug conjugatesBiomarkerBRCABreast cancerCancer drugsClinical trialsEarly breast cancerESMO-MCBSFDA approvalHER2Hormone receptorInnovationMetastatic breast cancerObjective response rateOverall survivalProgression-free survivalQuality of lifeTumor responseValue-based pricing

Identifiers

PMID39320645
PMCPMC11489271

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.